
End of post

I have recently become fascinated with this very topic and especially line-up optimization, mainly as it relates to the Cubs and how all their various pieces fit together in the most optimal line-up. I'm not sure batting #2 necessarily is a direct correlation to more RBI opportunities, but batting #2 leads to more plate appearances generally, and thus by consequence more RBI opportunities. It is interesting to note that Tom Tango works as a consultant for the Cubs and that they are batting Jorge Soler #2. "Best" hitter in the line-up batting #2 is an increasing trend but I think the primary reason is that it generates more plate appearances over the course of the season more so than just RBI opportunities.Atlas wrote:I was listening to the NY sports station this week and apparently Terry Collins cited some sort of sabermetrics for batting David Wright second.
Said there were statistically more RBI opportunities at the #2 hole than 3 or 4.
Not sure I buy that. I'd like to actually see the numbers.
But NONE of them have Billy Hamilton on base while they bat. If Hamilton can have a solid OBP, then certainly Votto could be in the leaders because how often Hamilton would be in scoring position. Of course, this is all factoring in that both of them could stay healthy all year.DOUGHBOYS wrote:Of the top 30 in rbi last year, only two hitters that hit in the two spot were among those leaders.
Mike Trout and Ian Kinsler.
Most every other hitter hit in the 3, 4, or 5 spots.
DOUGHBOYS wrote:Of the top 30 in rbi last year, only two hitters that hit in the two spot were among those leaders.
Mike Trout and Ian Kinsler.
Most every other hitter hit in the 3, 4, or 5 spots.