A question for the top dogs...

Gordon Gekko
Posts: 4317
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:00 pm
Contact:

A question for the top dogs...

Post by Gordon Gekko » Tue Feb 19, 2008 12:46 pm

Originally posted by rockitsauce:

Since I saw you had a YouTube link, I checked it out and was surprised to hear you say that you'd take Markakis, and if he wasn't there, THEN you'd take Ichiro. Maybe I'm even more of a rookie than I thought, but I am def taking Ichi before 'Kakis. Care to elaborate?



Also, I have 4th pick in upcoming sat league...too early for Santana??? Any advice greatly appreciated, thanks & good luck to all. markakis or ichiro can fit a plan very well. it all depends on what your plan is walking into the draft. choose the one that fits. it's that simple.



as for santana, he could be good there, but you need to exercise some patience when it comes to getting the rest of your pitchers.

sportsbettingman
Posts: 3038
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:00 pm
Contact:

A question for the top dogs...

Post by sportsbettingman » Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:37 pm

I'm sick...so what!



Anyone want the thrill this music brings with it to this dreary off-season? (and that beautiful stat ticker!)



www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qrlp_8tXxes



and if case you forgot what happened last season...(poor quality...but what the hell else are you doing right now?!) :D



www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RvANzCaWuo



~Lance (Can't wait!)



[ February 19, 2008, 08:56 PM: Message edited by: sportsbettingman ]
"The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once."

~Albert Einstein

sportsbettingman
Posts: 3038
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:00 pm
Contact:

A question for the top dogs...

Post by sportsbettingman » Tue Feb 19, 2008 3:00 pm

Just an FYI for those who like to post links, and wonder why half the time they fail.



If you edit the post with the link...I believe the software recognizes the "working link", and adds the URL stuff, which in essence...disables the working link.



I had to go back and edit to remove the automatically added **** crap...and now what once failed is working again.



Just in case you care.



~Lance
"The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once."

~Albert Einstein

Less than Dave
Posts: 712
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:00 pm
Contact:

A question for the top dogs...

Post by Less than Dave » Tue Feb 19, 2008 3:01 pm

hahahaha that was some funny **** about writing in the sand :D

...think I might try that this year...



I say take Hanley #2, I don't think something that didn't even stop him when it was "broken" will stop him now that it's fixed. 4 is too early for Santana.. earliest I'd take him would be like 13, but I can see him around maybe 8 or so. At 4 you should get whoever is leftover from the Wright/AROD/Hanley/Reyes foursome.

Spyhunter
Posts: 1560
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:00 pm
Contact:

A question for the top dogs...

Post by Spyhunter » Tue Feb 19, 2008 3:13 pm

don't forget Rollins at 4

Less than Dave
Posts: 712
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:00 pm
Contact:

A question for the top dogs...

Post by Less than Dave » Tue Feb 19, 2008 3:14 pm

yes I suppose he and Holliday could be considered there as well.

Post Reply