DOUGHBOYS wrote:Not really.Deadheadz wrote:Now yer thinking like Mike Rizzo!
I'm trying to think like you, but not succeeding. Nor do I want to....

DOUGHBOYS wrote:Not really.Deadheadz wrote:Now yer thinking like Mike Rizzo!
I'm trying to think like you, but not succeeding. Nor do I want to....
+1DOUGHBOYS wrote:Not really.Deadheadz wrote:Now yer thinking like Mike Rizzo!
I'm trying to think like you, but not succeeding. Nor do I want to....
Trying to but not wanting to...sounds like a great use of your time.DOUGHBOYS wrote: Not really.
I'm trying to think like you, but not succeeding. Nor do I want to....
Question for you is: Did you draft him at pick 6 or higher? Would you?BK METS wrote:Really no shock at 6, if someone really wants him. I have already drafted him in the first round of a few DCs and would gladly take him again.Deadheadz wrote: Harper at 6th overall?
I think we just discovered the identity of Anonymous:
Toronto Mayor Rob Ford, welcome to the NFBC.
Yes, crapping on somebody who drafts Harper sixth Overall is much better use of time.Deadheadz wrote:Trying to but not wanting to...sounds like a great use of your time.DOUGHBOYS wrote: Not really.
I'm trying to think like you, but not succeeding. Nor do I want to....
Point is, you don't have to be a crack smoking Canadian mayor to buy into the hype of Bryce Harper or any other player (Puig, Gyorko, etc) with a short track record and high upside.
But paying a premium for upside doesn't usually end up well. Value and luck seems to be what wins a league. Luck being things like drafting Jose Fernandez in rounds 45-50 or David Ortiz in rounds 15+ last season.
Best of luck to Bryce Harper and his owners. In my opinion, you'll need it.
Crapping on that pick was my honest opinion which was what Greg asked for after he posted the results and said "Thoughts?"DOUGHBOYS wrote: Yes, crapping on somebody who drafts Harper sixth Overall is much better use of time.
You act like you still do.DOUGHBOYS wrote: Look, I used to know it all too. At one time of our lives, we all did.
WRONG! I was disappointed that I didn't get to take Hanley at 8 but he went 6th and my plan for that draft was to take three high end SS with my first three picks. Crap on that if you want but I stuck to my plan.DOUGHBOYS wrote: In your mind, Tulo was more attractive at eight,
You know how to stop, so please don't let me stop you.DOUGHBOYS wrote: while crack is involved in thinking about Harper at six.
I don't get it, but like said before, I don't want to.
Yes..."interesting" or crack induced. Either way these 6 rd DC results are fun to see how some use ADP on 'their guys' and 'reach'. Yesterday Medlen at 60 and today Bruce at 14. Who cares really. Team construction matters much more than one or two reaches but unfortunately we don't get that with only 6 rounds so these at least help pass the time.ikenbaseball wrote:The last draft had some interesting picks.
1.14 Jay Bruce
3.10 Billy Hamilton (picked just before Choo)
4.12 Jose Abreu
Krys
You've been reading your Forecaster again!Gekko wrote:He had better power numbers than Cespedes and Puig. Could hit 35+ in the Cell
Edwards Kings wrote:I cannot get my mind around Jose Abreu, and it is more than just my typical Missouri/Missouri mentality. Sure, the White Sox are rebuilding, but there seems to be a premium placed on him and he seems to be usually the first name of the (apologies to Dan) second tier. With other options on the roster who can play first, one wonders how many AB he will get and how he will handle MLB pitching with his big swing. Is he really going to show that much better than Rizzo or Belt?
I'm betting when people stand close to you, they can hear the ocean.Deadheadz wrote:Crapping on that pick was my honest opinion which was what Greg asked for after he posted the results and said "Thoughts?"DOUGHBOYS wrote: Yes, crapping on somebody who drafts Harper sixth Overall is much better use of time.
You said you're "trying to" understand where I'm coming from "but not wanting to" - so why waste your time trying?
You act like you still do.DOUGHBOYS wrote: Look, I used to know it all too. At one time of our lives, we all did.
WRONG! I was disappointed that I didn't get to take Hanley at 8 but he went 6th and my plan for that draft was to take three high end SS with my first three picks. Crap on that if you want but I stuck to my plan.DOUGHBOYS wrote: In your mind, Tulo was more attractive at eight,
You know how to stop, so please don't let me stop you.DOUGHBOYS wrote: while crack is involved in thinking about Harper at six.
I don't get it, but like said before, I don't want to.
OK. I can see that. But does that put you in on Abreu in the 4th, 6th or 8th round assuming you haven't picked a first baseman prior?Roger Dorn wrote:Edwards Kings wrote:I cannot get my mind around Jose Abreu, and it is more than just my typical Missouri/Missouri mentality. Sure, the White Sox are rebuilding, but there seems to be a premium placed on him and he seems to be usually the first name of the (apologies to Dan) second tier. With other options on the roster who can play first, one wonders how many AB he will get and how he will handle MLB pitching with his big swing. Is he really going to show that much better than Rizzo or Belt?
IMO Belt's HR ceiling = Abreu's floor assuming comparable ABs
I wouldn't split 10's in blackjack with your money up there.ALL-IN JD wrote:$150 DC leagues are WHOLE different animal then a $1600 Main Event League. It's easy to split 10's in a blackjack with a $10 bet up there but I doubt you see many do it with $1000 bet up there. I will be anxious to see how often Jay Bruce goes at 14 with $1600 on the line instead of $150.
I can't blame someone for taking him in the 6th but I like the draft to come to me especially for uncertain early rounders like Abreu. I know value blah, blah, blah. If he 'fell' to the 9th-10th I would feel better about it but my feelings have little to do with winning.Edwards Kings wrote:OK. I can see that. But does that put you in on Abreu in the 4th, 6th or 8th round assuming you haven't picked a first baseman prior?Roger Dorn wrote:Edwards Kings wrote:I cannot get my mind around Jose Abreu, and it is more than just my typical Missouri/Missouri mentality. Sure, the White Sox are rebuilding, but there seems to be a premium placed on him and he seems to be usually the first name of the (apologies to Dan) second tier. With other options on the roster who can play first, one wonders how many AB he will get and how he will handle MLB pitching with his big swing. Is he really going to show that much better than Rizzo or Belt?
IMO Belt's HR ceiling = Abreu's floor assuming comparable ABs
VERY TRUE!ALL-IN JD wrote:Although drafting a guy based on his spring training stats can be a recipe for disaster as well!!![]()