Baseball Prospectus

Attie
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 6:00 pm

Baseball Prospectus

Post by Attie » Thu Mar 10, 2011 9:40 am

Guys, I'd be happy to take your money at 20 FOR 1 odds, but I don't want to get myself or Greg in trouble with the IRS for internet wagering.......I didn't realize there were so many Baseball Prospectus employees on these message boards......by the way, in response to the Humen Fund, let me say I LOVE your podcasts, and I listen to the Pike and Yellow Bird show every Friday.....great to hear you guys back on the air.....hopefully for an hour this week.......keep talking NFBC stuff.........I'm sure Halladay must be ranked about 20th on your starting pitcher list if you're projecting him for under 14 wins......

Layin'theSmackDown
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:00 pm
Contact:

Baseball Prospectus

Post by Layin'theSmackDown » Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:09 pm

Originally posted by headhunters:

kinda think if you did the above it would sort of negate a big reason for regression. inuries are cooked in. sort of like the "over" on 20 homers by utely bp's projection is 32 gs 239 ip 14w. theres nothing "cooked in" that stat line.

headhunters
Posts: 1976
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 6:00 pm

Baseball Prospectus

Post by headhunters » Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:59 pm

got it. you are correct if that is how they did it.

Post Reply