NFBC Message Boards

The list below provides an approximation (+/- 5%) of what percentage of the top 20 teams' points were provided by their first 23 selections. Basically how efficient was their draft in terms of contribution to their final stats. Showtime's negative number is basically ZERO contribution from its pitchers drafted in totality.



FJ Fantasy and Weird Science's offense was basically on cruise control. Showtime easily had to work the hardest to get where he got. MGBS is perhaps the only one whom was able to kick back and relax based on what he got out of the draft.



From this data, one can surmise that approxmately 50-70% of this game is the DRAFT and the other 30-50% is FAAB and roster activation. Just goes to show you just how much work goes into making it into the top 20.



Number Team Draft Bat% Draft Pit% Draft Tot%

1 Moneymaker 54% 64% 59%

2 The Doughboys 71% 54% 63%

3 MGBS109 94% 85% 89%

4 Appleton Hays 69% 65% 67%

5 CC's Desperados NFBC 05 48% 23% 36%

6 Rototimes.com 64% 59% 62%

7 Team Cameron 64% 64% 64%

8 FJ Fantasy Sports 102% 22% 60%

9 Team Jaffe 84% 64% 74%

10 Bats from Hell 33% 59% 47%

11 Hell Bent For Leather 53% 38% 45%

12 Panic 37% 61% 49%

13 MT Pockets 46% 23% 35%

14 Team Petit 63% 43% 53%

15 Ambrosious's Mustache 58% 27% 42%

16 WEIRD SCIENCE 95% 40% 68%

17 Showtime 66% -62% 13%

18 Quahogs 70% 25% 51%

19 Hopping Buffaloes 53% 46% 49%

20 No Balls No Babies! 71% 71% 71%



[ October 14, 2005, 04:02 PM: Message edited by: nydownunder ]

MGBS' Draft and Player contributions (if used 100% of the time). As flawless as they come!



Rd Player Value

1 Alfonso Soriano 12.8

2 Miguel Cabrera 12.3

3 Michael Young 11.2

4 Scott Podsednik 5.5

5 Josh Beckett 7.3

6 A.J. Burnett 6.9

7 Sean Casey 1.1

8 Roy Halladay 6.8

9 Chad Cordero 7.5

10 Brandon Inge 1.2

11 Pat Burrell 7.3

12 Brandon Webb 6.7

13 Bob Wickman 3.6

14 Casey Blake -0.3

15 Raul Ibanez 5.8

16 Ken Griffey Jr. 7.5

17 Noah Lowry 4.8

18 Jermaine Dye 6.0

19 Adam Everett -0.6

20 Esteban Loaiza 4.8

21 Josh Phelps -8.6

22 Mike MacDougal 2.0

23 Chris Capuano 5.5

Originally posted by nydownunder:

The list below provides an approximation (+/- 5%) of what percentage of the top 20 teams' points were provided by their first 23 selections. Basically how efficient was their draft in terms of contribution to their final stats. Showtime's negative number is basically ZERO contribution from its pitchers drafted in totality.



FJ Fantasy and Weird Science's offense was basically on cruise control. Showtime easily had to work the hardest to get where he got. MGBS is perhaps the only one whom was able to kick back and relax based on what he got out of the draft.



From this data, one can surmise that approxmately 50-70% of this game is the DRAFT and the other 30-50% is FAAB and roster activation. Just goes to show you just how much work goes into making it in the top 20.



Number Team Draft Bat% Draft Pit% Draft Tot%

1 Moneymaker 54% 64% 59%

2 The Doughboys 71% 54% 63%

3 MGBS109 94% 85% 89%

4 Appleton Hays 69% 65% 67%

5 CC's Desperados NFBC 05 48% 23% 36%

6 Rototimes.com 64% 59% 62%

7 Team Cameron 64% 64% 64%

8 FJ Fantasy Sports 102% 22% 60%

9 Team Jaffe 84% 64% 74%

10 Bats from Hell 33% 59% 47%

11 Hell Bent For Leather 53% 38% 45%

12 Panic 37% 61% 49%

13 MT Pockets 46% 23% 35%

14 Team Petit 63% 43% 53%

15 Ambrosious's Mustache 58% 27% 42%

16 WEIRD SCIENCE 95% 40% 68%

17 Showtime 66% -62% 13%

18 Quahogs 70% 25% 51%

19 Hopping Buffaloes 53% 46% 49%

20 No Balls No Babies! 71% 71% 71% This is great work.



I would love to see an analysis of the FA picks for these teams, and the VALUE they had towards the teams. Especially some of the lower scores.



What NFBC teams had the most value from their FAAB picks this year?

UFS



For the draft analysis, it was fairly easy to gather and calculate (ie easy cuts and pastes). Doing an analysis of the FAAB would require gathering a lot more data, including timing. I would simply make the general assumption that the difference is FAAB, abit of picks 24-30, with perhaps a really small percentage (ie 0-5%) for active/bench decisions.



I've got time on my hands, but not that much.