Over/Under for Lugo SB: Your best guess?
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:33 am
Boston has earned a reputation as a low-SB Moneyball-style team. The numbers seem to justify this reputation: The Red Sox were last in the majors in SB last year and were in the bottom three in 2005. Team SB doesn’t tell the whole story, though, so I decided to do a little more digging. I compared the before-and-after SB numbers for the five players (Damon, Renteria, Loretta, Crisp, and Gonzalez) who have been full-timers in Boston and elsewhere over the last two years. It’s an admittedly small sample, but the numbers are still interesting. Four of the players (Damon, Renteria, Loretta, and Gonzalez) ran much less in Boston, while one player (Crisp) ran more.
The aggregate statistics are listed below. For this comparison, I’m using the stolen base opportunity (SBO) calculation, which divides stolen base attempts by times on first base.
In Boston: 64 SB attempts in 764 times on 1B = 8% SBO
Before/After Boston: 99 SB attempts in 762 times on 1B = 13% SBO
In this sample, players attempted 55% more SB before/after Boston. (“In Boston” includes: 2005 Damon, 2005 Renteria, 2006 Loretta, 2006 Gonzalez, 2006 Crisp. “Before/After Boston” includes: 2006 Damon, 2006 Renteria, 2005 Loretta, 2005 Gonzalez, 2005 Crisp.)
So, getting to Julio Lugo and the subject of this thread. I think it’s safe to predict that Lugo’s SB rate will go down in Boston, and the analysis above indicates that it could go down dramatically. Complicating matters is the fact that Lugo is extremely inconsistent on the basepaths. Everyone remembers his 39 SB season in 2005, but his second highest total is only 24 SB, and he has stolen as few as 12 bases in 2001 & 2003 (before he was traded to SB-happy Tampa).
Given Boston’s miserly SB philosophy and Lugo’s inconsistent history, I’m leaning towards a conservative SB projection. My over/under? 18 SB. I’m interested to hear other opinions, though. Can anyone make a case that it's safe to project 25 SB for Lugo in Boston?
[ December 08, 2006, 02:35 PM: Message edited by: The Lollygaggers ]
The aggregate statistics are listed below. For this comparison, I’m using the stolen base opportunity (SBO) calculation, which divides stolen base attempts by times on first base.
In Boston: 64 SB attempts in 764 times on 1B = 8% SBO
Before/After Boston: 99 SB attempts in 762 times on 1B = 13% SBO
In this sample, players attempted 55% more SB before/after Boston. (“In Boston” includes: 2005 Damon, 2005 Renteria, 2006 Loretta, 2006 Gonzalez, 2006 Crisp. “Before/After Boston” includes: 2006 Damon, 2006 Renteria, 2005 Loretta, 2005 Gonzalez, 2005 Crisp.)
So, getting to Julio Lugo and the subject of this thread. I think it’s safe to predict that Lugo’s SB rate will go down in Boston, and the analysis above indicates that it could go down dramatically. Complicating matters is the fact that Lugo is extremely inconsistent on the basepaths. Everyone remembers his 39 SB season in 2005, but his second highest total is only 24 SB, and he has stolen as few as 12 bases in 2001 & 2003 (before he was traded to SB-happy Tampa).
Given Boston’s miserly SB philosophy and Lugo’s inconsistent history, I’m leaning towards a conservative SB projection. My over/under? 18 SB. I’m interested to hear other opinions, though. Can anyone make a case that it's safe to project 25 SB for Lugo in Boston?
[ December 08, 2006, 02:35 PM: Message edited by: The Lollygaggers ]