The 75% Solution
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 7:04 am
Just received my 2007 Baseball Forecaster courtesy the Early Bird Special from Shandler Enterprises (thanks Ron!). On page 44 of the new book, there is an article entitled "The 75% Solution" which discusses optimal league penetration -- that is, the percentage of the major league player pool that is drafted onto a fantasy league's rosters. One paragraph in particular caught my eye:
==========================================
15-team mixed league (NFBC format)
The National Fantasy Baseball Championship runs 15-team mixed leagues with 30-man rosters (23 active, 7 reserve). That's a 60% penetration. While many of its participants probably think that goes deep enough, the reality is that each owner has to sift through at least 300 free agents every transaction period. These leagues can dig down to 75% without affecting too much. Adding threee teams gets the percentage up to 72%. Increasing roster size to 37 gets the percentage up to 75%. A hybrid -- 16 teams with 35-man rosters -- would be another alternative.
==============================================
I was wondering whether anyone else agrees with this notion of a 75% penetration rate. It seems to devalue free agency, and probably overemphasizes the draft. In short, despite the author's claims, our current 60% rate is probably a good thing.
==========================================
15-team mixed league (NFBC format)
The National Fantasy Baseball Championship runs 15-team mixed leagues with 30-man rosters (23 active, 7 reserve). That's a 60% penetration. While many of its participants probably think that goes deep enough, the reality is that each owner has to sift through at least 300 free agents every transaction period. These leagues can dig down to 75% without affecting too much. Adding threee teams gets the percentage up to 72%. Increasing roster size to 37 gets the percentage up to 75%. A hybrid -- 16 teams with 35-man rosters -- would be another alternative.
==============================================
I was wondering whether anyone else agrees with this notion of a 75% penetration rate. It seems to devalue free agency, and probably overemphasizes the draft. In short, despite the author's claims, our current 60% rate is probably a good thing.