The All-Star Game
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 11:59 am
'The baseball All-Star Game has drawn a record-low national television rating for the second straight year.
The American League's 4-2 victory over the NL in San Diego on Tuesday night got a 5.4 rating on Fox. The previous low was 6.6 last year for the game in Cincinnati.'.......
The baseball All-Star game is still the best and most watched All-Star game of the four major sports.
That's not saying much though. The other three sports almost give up playing defense in their games.
Let's face it, the All-Star game will never be the same.
With interleague play a natural now, the magic of seeing Trout vs. Harper pales in seeing Mantle vs. Mays.
Players also do not have allegiances to their leagues.
They sign for the highest dollars, no matter the league.
As much as MLB has tried to say "This game means something", it doesn't.
Half of the players involved are already out of the pennant race.
The players who do have clubs involved in the pennant race know that they have to qualify for the playoffs first, before going through their own league gaintlets to get to the World Series.
Cleveland has the best record in the American League.
Their fans don't come to their own games let alone celebrate a possible home field advantage.
So, what's the answer?
Change the format, maybe?
U.S. vs. the World?
East vs. West?
Doesn't sound all that great either.
The timing is hard to change.
Players wouldn't be ready before the season.
After the season, players just want to go home or to the playoffs.
I believe that the All-Star game will remain what it is.
The wonder of seeing the best players on one field is missing. Technology has made all these players as familiar as our hometown players.
It is more of an awards show type of entertainment than sports viewing.
Each player trying to sing their hit in reminding folks why they are there.
And less and less folks will be interested.
The American League's 4-2 victory over the NL in San Diego on Tuesday night got a 5.4 rating on Fox. The previous low was 6.6 last year for the game in Cincinnati.'.......
The baseball All-Star game is still the best and most watched All-Star game of the four major sports.
That's not saying much though. The other three sports almost give up playing defense in their games.
Let's face it, the All-Star game will never be the same.
With interleague play a natural now, the magic of seeing Trout vs. Harper pales in seeing Mantle vs. Mays.
Players also do not have allegiances to their leagues.
They sign for the highest dollars, no matter the league.
As much as MLB has tried to say "This game means something", it doesn't.
Half of the players involved are already out of the pennant race.
The players who do have clubs involved in the pennant race know that they have to qualify for the playoffs first, before going through their own league gaintlets to get to the World Series.
Cleveland has the best record in the American League.
Their fans don't come to their own games let alone celebrate a possible home field advantage.
So, what's the answer?
Change the format, maybe?
U.S. vs. the World?
East vs. West?
Doesn't sound all that great either.
The timing is hard to change.
Players wouldn't be ready before the season.
After the season, players just want to go home or to the playoffs.
I believe that the All-Star game will remain what it is.
The wonder of seeing the best players on one field is missing. Technology has made all these players as familiar as our hometown players.
It is more of an awards show type of entertainment than sports viewing.
Each player trying to sing their hit in reminding folks why they are there.
And less and less folks will be interested.