Post
by RODGER » Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:04 pm
I used the location from where last year’s money winners drafted as my basis for a model.
No draft position produced more league champions in 2006 that the #15 hole. 4 of the 22 league champs had the 15th pick, and 6 teams drafting 15th finished in the money.
The second most league champions came out of the #13 hole last year. 3 of the 22 league champs had the 13th pick, and 6 teams drafting 13th finished in the money.
The only draft position which produced seven teams that finished in the money was the #14 hole.
The only other draft positions with at least six teams finishing in the money were the #11 and #10 holes.
In all, 12 of the 22 league champs picked between 10th and 15th. As a comparison, only 4 of the 22 league champs picked between 1st and 5th.
Nobody won a league title in 2006 picking out of either the #2 or #3 holes, and draft slots #1, #5, #6 and #8 only produced one league champ each.
Basically, the best spots in 2006 were at the end of the draft. The most success came from teams who picked 15th, 13th, 14th, 10th and then 11th.
The least success in 2006 went to teams who picked 6th, 1st, 7th, 2nd and then 3rd.
Is one year enough of a sample for this to be scientifically valid? No.
Is it possible that this pattern has been going on for more than one year? Of course.
“The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.”
——Thomas Paine