Page 1 of 1

2021 Position Eligibility

Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2020 1:19 pm
by mdecav
Greg,

We'll need a decision on these guys for 2021:

Pavin Smith, ARI - 5 games at 1B & OF
Brian O'Grady, TB - 1 game at 1B & OF
Sergio Alcantara, DET - 6 games at 2B & 3B
Wilmer Difo, WAS - 4 games at 2B & SS

Re: 2021 Position Eligibility

Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2020 2:25 pm
by Greg Ambrosius
mdecav wrote:
Mon Sep 28, 2020 1:19 pm
Greg,

We'll need a decision on these guys for 2021:

Pavin Smith, ARI - 5 games at 1B & OF
Brian O'Grady, TB - 1 game at 1B & OF
Sergio Alcantara, DET - 6 games at 2B & 3B
Wilmer Difo, WAS - 4 games at 2B & SS
Pavin Smith, ARI - 1B
Brian O'Grady, TB - OF
Sergio Alcantara, DET - 2B
Wilmer Difo, WAS - SS

Re: 2021 Position Eligibility

Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2020 8:39 pm
by coachmo
Paven smith played 5 at 1b and 5 at of so why only 1b eligibility instead of both?

Re: 2021 Position Eligibility

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 8:38 am
by Greg Ambrosius
coachmo wrote:
Sun Nov 15, 2020 8:39 pm
Paven smith played 5 at 1b and 5 at of so why only 1b eligibility instead of both?
Because you need to play at least 7 games at each position to get eligibility at both. If you play less than 7 games at any position in the majors, then we determine the one eligible position to start 2021. Our rules are pretty well defined:

b) If a player did not appear in 7 games at any position, he qualifies at the one position he played most frequently the prior season in the majors. Designated Hitter is considered a position for these purposes (pinch-hitting is not). A player who only qualifies as a DH may only be assigned to the UT position. If a player's most games played at a position is less than 7 and tied among more than one position, the NFBC commissioner will assign eligibility at one position only.

Re: 2021 Position Eligibility

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:29 am
by mdecav
Greg Ambrosius wrote:
Mon Nov 16, 2020 8:38 am
coachmo wrote:
Sun Nov 15, 2020 8:39 pm
Paven smith played 5 at 1b and 5 at of so why only 1b eligibility instead of both?
Because you need to play at least 7 games at each position to get eligibility at both. If you play less than 7 games at any position in the majors, then we determine the one eligible position to start 2021. Our rules are pretty well defined:

b) If a player did not appear in 7 games at any position, he qualifies at the one position he played most frequently the prior season in the majors. Designated Hitter is considered a position for these purposes (pinch-hitting is not). A player who only qualifies as a DH may only be assigned to the UT position. If a player's most games played at a position is less than 7 and tied among more than one position, the NFBC commissioner will assign eligibility at one position only.
Clarification on one player: Yermin Mercedes. His only plate appearance in 2020 was pinch hitting for a DH. I assume in that scenario that makes him utility. Otherwise he’d be catcher.

Re: 2021 Position Eligibility

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:25 am
by Greg Ambrosius
mdecav wrote:
Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:29 am
Greg Ambrosius wrote:
Mon Nov 16, 2020 8:38 am
coachmo wrote:
Sun Nov 15, 2020 8:39 pm
Paven smith played 5 at 1b and 5 at of so why only 1b eligibility instead of both?
Because you need to play at least 7 games at each position to get eligibility at both. If you play less than 7 games at any position in the majors, then we determine the one eligible position to start 2021. Our rules are pretty well defined:

b) If a player did not appear in 7 games at any position, he qualifies at the one position he played most frequently the prior season in the majors. Designated Hitter is considered a position for these purposes (pinch-hitting is not). A player who only qualifies as a DH may only be assigned to the UT position. If a player's most games played at a position is less than 7 and tied among more than one position, the NFBC commissioner will assign eligibility at one position only.
Clarification on one player: Yermin Mercedes. His only plate appearance in 2020 was pinch hitting for a DH. I assume in that scenario that makes him utility. Otherwise he’d be catcher.
Under our rules, you are correct.