NFBC Message Boards

I plan to participate in either the NY or CHI draft and I have 2 silent partners (who are willing to supply 25% of the entry fee each *312.50*) - These partners are just friends of mine who are basically "backing" me for 25% of all proceeds.



I'm now looking for a potential 4th co-owner/manager..



You would be responsible for 1/4th of the entry fee ($312.50).. and you would get the 2nd seat as co-manager at the draft. I will give you an equal say in all selections, but if there are any disagreements in any selections(as anyone who's co-owned in a draft before knows there will be) I would have final veto power.



I am willing to draft in either CHI or NY.. but I would PREFER CHICAGO as it is much closer to where I am (Minnesota).



If you're interested.. please contact me ASAP for more details.



-Jason

EMAIL: [email protected]

AIM: jarooty

Also... I didn't realize there was a co-owner fee. So if you're considering my offer, you'd have to add $50 to the $312.50



Thanks!

JAR - sent you a personnal e-mail. Also live in Mn. Where did this extra $50.00 come from -that's bull.

JAR - sent you a personnal e-mail. Also live in Mn. Where did this extra $50.00 come from -that's bull.

Originally posted by Dak:

JAR - sent you a personnal e-mail. Also live in Mn. Where did this extra $50.00 come from -that's bull. an argument already!!! this is classic!!!!

DAK, I'd guess he was splitting the co-managers

fee which is a hundred. He also stated the conditions during the draft and any payout.

So whats the problem? IF you like it get together. If you don't than don't. Complaining about a deal you haven't made doesn't make much sense.

Originally posted by Dak:

JAR - sent you a personnal e-mail. Also live in Mn. Where did this extra $50.00 come from -that's bull. Dak.. I didn't pull that $50 fee out of the air man. the NFBC charges $100 for a co-owner to be at the draft. That $100 fee would be split between me and the other co-owner who is drafting.



[ February 02, 2005, 07:15 PM: Message edited by: JAR ]

Maybe the Co-Owner 4 should pay the ENTIRE hundred dollar co-manager fee. After all, he is getting to sit at the table (although surrenders final say) while Co-Owners 2 and 3 only get to listen in from Co-Owner 1's cell phone.



A steal of a deal, if you ask me...

Originally posted by King of Queens:

Maybe the Co-Owner 4 should pay the ENTIRE hundred dollar co-manager fee. After all, he is getting to sit at the table (although surrenders final say) while Co-Owners 2 and 3 only get to listen in from Co-Owner 1's cell phone.



A steal of a deal, if you ask me... I think it's cool that two guys from the same state with "Dar" and "Jak" are getting together over this.



Trying to decide if the team name should be "DarJak" or "JakDar"



Hmmm....



Dave