Experts
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:21 am
Last year, Lindy Hinkelman did what all of us strive for. He mastered the NFBC and won the jackpot. I've never met the man, but hear from very reliable sources that he is a great guy.
Shawn Childs has finished in the top five of the NFBC three or four times (sorry Shawn, I'm too lazy to look it up). I have met Shawn, he is a nice fellow. Heck, last year when I didn't post for awhile, he called me to make sure I was ok. At my age, he probably had concerns
I spotlight this duo, not for their accomplishments or their character, rather, that if we had 'experts' in the NFBC, these two would be near the top of every list.
I hate the word 'expert' as it pertains to fantasy baseball. Anybody that knows me, knows that I don't throw the hate word around much. I know that neither Shawn or Lindy have called themselves 'experts'. It's not in them.
A friend of mine in the NFBC, Bob (Spartacus), was kind enough to let me in on one of his drafts early in the season and asked me for a critique afterwards. Putting myself in the 'expert' role, I wrote a harsh follow up. I told Bob that drafting Adam Dunn changed his draft, making it seem as though he had created a hole he would never climb out of. I've beaten myself up mentally from the moment I hit that send button to the present. Who the Hell am I? Bob knew that league better than I, and knows fantasy as well as I. I was role playing an expert, not a friend, I'll never fall into that trap again.
Since then, Bob is atop or near the top of that league and Adam Dunn has hit circles around any of my recommended players. A pat on the back for Bob, a bitchslap for me.
Matthew Berry also hates the term 'expert' and has said he would never use it in describing himself or his work. THAT is a good start to eliminating the word from our hobby.
We have a hobby that cannot be mastered. Sure, Lindy conquered it for a year, and what a year. What Lindy did, to me, was the equivelant of a golfer winning all four major tournaments in one year, the Grand Slam. Lindy now has a team that ranks 392 of 435. And right now, Lindy is thinking, 'Sure Dan, you're too lazy to look up Shawn's facts, but you looked up that one up
I point it out, not to illustrate what I am sure is a frustrating year for Lindy, but that we have an ebb and flow hobby. We can be incredibly smart one year and Homer Simpson the next. Experts one year, novices the next.
This year I have decided to boycott any publication that has the word expert on the front or back cover. Most likely, I will not be buying any publications.
One magazine had the word on the front cover six times last year, more than the word 'fantasy', more than the word 'baseball'.
UGH.
I include the back cover because of the Forecaster. The Forecaster does not use the back cover for advertising. More so to describe their process and spout achievements. They used the word 'experts' three times on the back cover. Twice to describe their leagues, the other had this line, "Written by REAL Experts in Fantasy Play"
UGH.
Maybe somebody from the Forecaster can tell us the difference between a REAL expert and a normal or phony expert.
I don't want to pick on the Forecaster. In fact, I am hoping they lead the way to dismiss the word from their publication. Maybe others will follow suit. As of now, they rank 381 in our contest. NFBC'ers would be taking the word 'expert' on the back cover with a wry grain of salt should it be used next year.
'Experts' may sell magazines. I don't know. I do know that although there are knowledgeable folks in our industry, I know of none that would enjoy the tagline of being an 'expert'. Individually, writers, for the most part, do not refer to themselves as experts. I mostly blame editors for splashing it on covers and using it to such an extent as to cheapen the word itself.
Paraphrasing from something heard long ago-
'An expert is someone who will know tomorrow why the things he predicted yesterday didn't happen today'
THESE are the 'experts' in our industry.
[ July 10, 2010, 10:40 AM: Message edited by: DOUGHBOYS ]
Shawn Childs has finished in the top five of the NFBC three or four times (sorry Shawn, I'm too lazy to look it up). I have met Shawn, he is a nice fellow. Heck, last year when I didn't post for awhile, he called me to make sure I was ok. At my age, he probably had concerns
I spotlight this duo, not for their accomplishments or their character, rather, that if we had 'experts' in the NFBC, these two would be near the top of every list.
I hate the word 'expert' as it pertains to fantasy baseball. Anybody that knows me, knows that I don't throw the hate word around much. I know that neither Shawn or Lindy have called themselves 'experts'. It's not in them.
A friend of mine in the NFBC, Bob (Spartacus), was kind enough to let me in on one of his drafts early in the season and asked me for a critique afterwards. Putting myself in the 'expert' role, I wrote a harsh follow up. I told Bob that drafting Adam Dunn changed his draft, making it seem as though he had created a hole he would never climb out of. I've beaten myself up mentally from the moment I hit that send button to the present. Who the Hell am I? Bob knew that league better than I, and knows fantasy as well as I. I was role playing an expert, not a friend, I'll never fall into that trap again.
Since then, Bob is atop or near the top of that league and Adam Dunn has hit circles around any of my recommended players. A pat on the back for Bob, a bitchslap for me.
Matthew Berry also hates the term 'expert' and has said he would never use it in describing himself or his work. THAT is a good start to eliminating the word from our hobby.
We have a hobby that cannot be mastered. Sure, Lindy conquered it for a year, and what a year. What Lindy did, to me, was the equivelant of a golfer winning all four major tournaments in one year, the Grand Slam. Lindy now has a team that ranks 392 of 435. And right now, Lindy is thinking, 'Sure Dan, you're too lazy to look up Shawn's facts, but you looked up that one up
I point it out, not to illustrate what I am sure is a frustrating year for Lindy, but that we have an ebb and flow hobby. We can be incredibly smart one year and Homer Simpson the next. Experts one year, novices the next.
This year I have decided to boycott any publication that has the word expert on the front or back cover. Most likely, I will not be buying any publications.
One magazine had the word on the front cover six times last year, more than the word 'fantasy', more than the word 'baseball'.
UGH.
I include the back cover because of the Forecaster. The Forecaster does not use the back cover for advertising. More so to describe their process and spout achievements. They used the word 'experts' three times on the back cover. Twice to describe their leagues, the other had this line, "Written by REAL Experts in Fantasy Play"
UGH.
Maybe somebody from the Forecaster can tell us the difference between a REAL expert and a normal or phony expert.
I don't want to pick on the Forecaster. In fact, I am hoping they lead the way to dismiss the word from their publication. Maybe others will follow suit. As of now, they rank 381 in our contest. NFBC'ers would be taking the word 'expert' on the back cover with a wry grain of salt should it be used next year.
'Experts' may sell magazines. I don't know. I do know that although there are knowledgeable folks in our industry, I know of none that would enjoy the tagline of being an 'expert'. Individually, writers, for the most part, do not refer to themselves as experts. I mostly blame editors for splashing it on covers and using it to such an extent as to cheapen the word itself.
Paraphrasing from something heard long ago-
'An expert is someone who will know tomorrow why the things he predicted yesterday didn't happen today'
THESE are the 'experts' in our industry.
[ July 10, 2010, 10:40 AM: Message edited by: DOUGHBOYS ]