Page 1 of 1
Cold Hard Look V Diamond League
Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:38 am
by Schwks
Youve heard of the Diamond League....lot of cash to enter, large pay out and large percentage payout. The two teams atop that league, both in the 108 point range, employed the reliever only strategy Team Ferrari and Diamond Dog...neither drafted more then 2-3 starters. Both drafted at least three closers on draft day.
How does this affect the NFBC going forward, if the winner is one of those two teams? Does the innings limit argument come to a head?
As an aside, both teams hit big with mid-late round hitting gold such as Chris Young, Ad Beltre and others.
Cold Hard Look V Diamond League
Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 1:01 pm
by The Mighty Men
No, you just have to beat them at their own game. Simple as that.
Cold Hard Look V Diamond League
Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 1:10 pm
by Gekko
Originally posted by Schwks:
Youve heard of the Diamond League....lot of cash to enter, large pay out and large percentage payout. The two teams atop that league, both in the 108 point range, employed the reliever only strategy Team Ferrari and Diamond Dog...neither drafted more then 2-3 starters. Both drafted at least three closers on draft day.
How does this affect the NFBC going forward, if the winner is one of those two teams? Does the innings limit argument come to a head?
kudos to the owners as they used a strategy they best felt would put them in a position to win.
Cold Hard Look V Diamond League
Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:44 pm
by Sebadiah23
I might call the winner "Rich Loophole Boy" for the rest of their life, but a win is a win. Go Team Ferrari.
-Craig K. and his buddy Lou N. from NFBBC.
Cold Hard Look V Diamond League
Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 3:35 pm
by Spyhunter
Originally posted by Schwks:
Youve heard of the Diamond League....lot of cash to enter, large pay out and large percentage payout. The two teams atop that league, both in the 108 point range, employed the reliever only strategy Team Ferrari and Diamond Dog...neither drafted more then 2-3 starters. Both drafted at least three closers on draft day.
How does this affect the NFBC going forward, if the winner is one of those two teams? Does the innings limit argument come to a head?
As an aside, both teams hit big with mid-late round hitting gold such as Chris Young, Ad Beltre and others. The issue I have with this approach is the distortion it causes not just with the draft, but the on-going FAAB$$. Imagine being able to save all your starters $$$ not just in the draft, but throughout the SEASON
GREG: Please go to 1000 Innings going forward!!!!!
[ August 21, 2010, 09:36 PM: Message edited by: Spyhunter ]