Online Drafting
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:13 am
The online drafts conducted since STATS has come on board have been the best in regard to the NFBC/NFFC.
Because so many drafts are now conducted online at various price points and need to have different draft MONITORS it becomes very important to have a clear plan in place on how picks go forward when somebody gets knocked offline and/or claims that a name the computer selected was NOT the player they wanted.
Personally, I experienced this handled in two different manners last season by NFBC representatives online last season. Here is an example:
First round, clock runs down on TEAM #12 and the computer makes a pick for this team. The draft goes forward and Team 13 - 14 - 15 actually make 2 selections as they made there second round selections as well. Now, TEAM #12 is back on the clock and is carrying on that his first round selection wasn't the player he chose. The draft gets stopped and the draft is BACKED up to allow TEAM #12 to re pick his first round selection. This has a ripple effect. Teams 13 -14 -15 have shown there hand. This should NEVER be allowed and should be written into your rules.
The way to HANDLE this is simple. All players are provided with a phone number at the start of each draft for moderators and a help button at the draft site. If any team acts in a manner fast enough to select a player during a draft, that player should be OFF limits. In the above example, Teams 13-14-15 should never have to lose a player to TEAM # 12 after that player was properly taken. However, if TEAM 12 can re-select any player not taken on the draftboard. So, now what do you do with the player TEAM #12 tossed back into the pool? In proper draft order TEAMS 13-14-15 should be asked if they have any interest in said player.
I had a second round player taken from my roster last year in a situation described above. I found it very frustrating, but I let it go so that the draft could go forward. However, it is something that can be improved upon going forward by having something written into the rules and moderators prepared to handle a similar situation.
Because so many drafts are now conducted online at various price points and need to have different draft MONITORS it becomes very important to have a clear plan in place on how picks go forward when somebody gets knocked offline and/or claims that a name the computer selected was NOT the player they wanted.
Personally, I experienced this handled in two different manners last season by NFBC representatives online last season. Here is an example:
First round, clock runs down on TEAM #12 and the computer makes a pick for this team. The draft goes forward and Team 13 - 14 - 15 actually make 2 selections as they made there second round selections as well. Now, TEAM #12 is back on the clock and is carrying on that his first round selection wasn't the player he chose. The draft gets stopped and the draft is BACKED up to allow TEAM #12 to re pick his first round selection. This has a ripple effect. Teams 13 -14 -15 have shown there hand. This should NEVER be allowed and should be written into your rules.
The way to HANDLE this is simple. All players are provided with a phone number at the start of each draft for moderators and a help button at the draft site. If any team acts in a manner fast enough to select a player during a draft, that player should be OFF limits. In the above example, Teams 13-14-15 should never have to lose a player to TEAM # 12 after that player was properly taken. However, if TEAM 12 can re-select any player not taken on the draftboard. So, now what do you do with the player TEAM #12 tossed back into the pool? In proper draft order TEAMS 13-14-15 should be asked if they have any interest in said player.
I had a second round player taken from my roster last year in a situation described above. I found it very frustrating, but I let it go so that the draft could go forward. However, it is something that can be improved upon going forward by having something written into the rules and moderators prepared to handle a similar situation.