Need 4 More Entries For All Time Draft

Suburban Strugglers · Post by **Suburban Strugglers** » Tue Nov 15, 2011 9:26 am

If anyone is interested in participating in the next all time draft just post in this thread or the other one already created.

NorCalAtlFan · Post by **NorCalAtlFan** » Tue Nov 15, 2011 9:46 am

i'm interested. have the rules/new rules been agreed on already?

thanks

Likewhat17 · Post by **Likewhat17** » Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:20 am

Originally posted by NorCalAtlFan:

i'm interested. have the rules/new rules been agreed on already?

thanks We're waiting for the 4 people to vote on what changes we want to make to the rules. Everything being discussed is on the other thread.

Gekko · Post by **Gekko** » Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:48 am

listen - someone is just gonna have to make a final call on the rules and whoever wants to play will sign up. if we delay much longer, we will lose a couple people who will start prepping for actual nfbc events.

btw, let's include 3RR and see what happens this time.

Navel Lint · Post by **Navel Lint** » Tue Nov 15, 2011 11:30 am

Are you doing this draft on the message board or via email?

3RR - I’m torn on this subject. One draft does not create enough of a sample to determine the necessity of 3RR, team 14 won. And I think it’s always possible to win from any of the 15 spots because every draft works out differently. Before football went to 3RR, teams won from every spot. However,that doesn’t mean it wasn’t needed.

As I review the results of that first draft, even though I was against the idea of 3RR, I’m starting to believe that it might be necessary. And I’m even more convinced that if you restrict the player pool by using a starting point of 1941/'71/'81 or whatever, that the effects of the top 5-10 picks will have even greater magnification, instead of less as some people may believe.

Blind Rounds – I’m absolutely convinced that they are necessary. I actually think that the whole subject could make for a wonderful discussion and I’d be happy to spend time with others someday talking about it; but for the purposes here, I believe at least 3 (and therefore 4 so that it goes 1-15, 15-1 twice) are required.

I’m still on the sideline…….. but I’m thinking about it.

NorCalAtlFan · Post by **NorCalAtlFan** » Tue Nov 15, 2011 11:32 am

Originally posted by Navel Lint:

Are you doing this draft on the message board or via email?

3RR - I’m torn on this subject. One draft does not create enough of a sample to determine the necessity of 3RR, team 14 won. And I think it’s always possible to win from any of the 15 spots because every draft works out differently. Before football went to 3RR, teams won from every spot. However,that doesn’t mean it wasn’t needed.

As I review the results of that first draft, even though I was against the idea of 3RR, I’m starting to believe that it might be necessary. And I’m even more convinced that if you restrict the player pool by using a starting point of 1941/'71/'81 or whatever, that the effects of the top 5-10 picks will have even greater magnification, instead of less as some people may believe.

Blind Rounds – I’m absolutely convinced that they are necessary. I actually think that the whole subject could make for a wonderful discussion and I’d be happy to spend time with others someday talking about it; but for the purposes here, I believe at least 3 (and therefore 4 so that it goes 1-15, 15-1 twice) are required.

I’m still on the sideline…….. but I’m thinking about it. that's where i'm at.

Gekko · Post by **Gekko** » Tue Nov 15, 2011 12:51 pm

naval and Cal in da house!!!

CC's Desperados · Post by **CC's Desperados** » Tue Nov 15, 2011 1:35 pm

Originally posted by Navel Lint:

Are you doing this draft on the message board or via email?

3RR - I’m torn on this subject. One draft does not create enough of a sample to determine the necessity of 3RR, team 14 won. And I think it’s always possible to win from any of the 15 spots because every draft works out differently. Before football went to 3RR, teams won from every spot. However,that doesn’t mean it wasn’t needed.

As I review the results of that first draft, even though I was against the idea of 3RR, I’m starting to believe that it might be necessary. And I’m even more convinced that if you restrict the player pool by using a starting point of 1941/'71/'81 or whatever, that the effects of the top 5-10 picks will have even greater magnification, instead of less as some people may believe.

Blind Rounds – I’m absolutely convinced that they are necessary. I actually think that the whole subject could make for a wonderful discussion and I’d be happy to spend time with others someday talking about it; but for the purposes here, I believe at least 3 (and therefore 4 so that it goes 1-15, 15-1 twice) are required.

I’m still on the sideline…….. but I’m thinking about it. So tell the big edge that is going to be drafted in the first five pick with a draft that starts at year 1941?

These's no Ed Walsh.

In baseball there are small edges through out the players pool at a multitude of positions. It's not like football where there are clear drop downs at limited positions.

Rog · Post by **Rog** » Tue Nov 15, 2011 1:49 pm

so who is all in as of right now?I am on the fence I just dont know how much homework I want to do.

Gekko · Post by **Gekko** » Tue Nov 15, 2011 1:51 pm

Originally posted by CC's Desperados:

quote:Originally posted by Navel Lint:

Are you doing this draft on the message board or via email?

3RR - I’m torn on this subject. One draft does not create enough of a sample to determine the necessity of 3RR, team 14 won. And I think it’s always possible to win from any of the 15 spots because every draft works out differently. Before football went to 3RR, teams won from every spot. However,that doesn’t mean it wasn’t needed.

As I review the results of that first draft, even though I was against the idea of 3RR, I’m starting to believe that it might be necessary. And I’m even more convinced that if you restrict the player pool by using a starting point of 1941/'71/'81 or whatever, that the effects of the top 5-10 picks will have even greater magnification, instead of less as some people may believe.

Blind Rounds – I’m absolutely convinced that they are necessary. I actually think that the whole subject could make for a wonderful discussion and I’d be happy to spend time with others someday talking about it; but for the purposes here, I believe at least 3 (and therefore 4 so that it goes 1-15, 15-1 twice) are required.

I’m still on the sideline…….. but I’m thinking about it. So tell the big edge that is going to be drafted in the first five pick with a draft that starts at year 1941?

These's no Ed Walsh.

In baseball there are small edges through out the players pool at a multitude of positions. It's not like football where there are clear drop downs at limited positions. [/QUOTE]shawn - sign up and put 15 as your first preference