Brett Wallace position?

Post Reply
jim.s
Posts: 160
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 6:00 pm
Contact:

Brett Wallace position?

Post by jim.s » Sun Aug 01, 2010 2:34 am

Brett Wallace is listed as 1B,3B. Similar question to one asked previously on Logan Morrison

User avatar
Tom Kessenich
Posts: 26046
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:00 pm
Contact:

Brett Wallace position?

Post by Tom Kessenich » Sun Aug 01, 2010 3:42 am

Originally posted by jim.s:

Brett Wallace is listed as 1B,3B. Similar question to one asked previously on Logan Morrison Wallace played most of his games in the minors last year at 3B so that would be his position eligibility.
Tom Kessenich
Manager of High Stakes Fantasy Games, SportsHub Technologies
Twitter - @TomKessenich

User avatar
Gekko
Posts: 5945
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:00 pm

Brett Wallace position?

Post by Gekko » Sun Aug 01, 2010 5:54 am

another day, another player where the position eligibility rules aren't being followed.




User avatar
Tom Kessenich
Posts: 26046
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:00 pm
Contact:

Brett Wallace position?

Post by Tom Kessenich » Sun Aug 01, 2010 5:58 am

Mark, Wallace is listed at 3B because that is the position where he played the most games in the minors in 2009. His position eligibility is correct.
Tom Kessenich
Manager of High Stakes Fantasy Games, SportsHub Technologies
Twitter - @TomKessenich

User avatar
Gekko
Posts: 5945
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:00 pm

Brett Wallace position?

Post by Gekko » Sun Aug 01, 2010 6:40 am

Originally posted by Tom Kessenich:

Mark, Wallace is listed at 3B because that is the position where he played the most games in the minors in 2009. His position eligibility is correct. i understand the 3B eligibility. why is he showing up as 1B eligible??

User avatar
Tom Kessenich
Posts: 26046
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:00 pm
Contact:

Brett Wallace position?

Post by Tom Kessenich » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:22 am

Originally posted by Gekko:

quote:Originally posted by Tom Kessenich:

Mark, Wallace is listed at 3B because that is the position where he played the most games in the minors in 2009. His position eligibility is correct. i understand the 3B eligibility. why is he showing up as 1B eligible?? [/QUOTE]He shouldn't be showing as having 1B eligibility. I just checked and he's only listed as 3B/CI eligible which is correct.
Tom Kessenich
Manager of High Stakes Fantasy Games, SportsHub Technologies
Twitter - @TomKessenich

User avatar
Gekko
Posts: 5945
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:00 pm

Brett Wallace position?

Post by Gekko » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:30 am

Originally posted by Tom Kessenich:

quote:Originally posted by Gekko:

quote:Originally posted by Tom Kessenich:

Mark, Wallace is listed at 3B because that is the position where he played the most games in the minors in 2009. His position eligibility is correct. i understand the 3B eligibility. why is he showing up as 1B eligible?? [/QUOTE]He shouldn't be showing as having 1B eligibility. I just checked and he's only listed as 3B/CI eligible which is correct.
[/QUOTE]As the first poster noted, he was showing 3B AND 1B eligibility earlier today. I even noticed it. Someone at Fanball must have switched it sometime today.



In any event, I am happy the issue was resolved, but again, WHY are these position issues STILL coming up???



[ August 01, 2010, 01:31 PM: Message edited by: Gekko ]

User avatar
Gekko
Posts: 5945
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:00 pm

Brett Wallace position?

Post by Gekko » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:33 am

and because of the Fanball position problem EXTRA ATTENTION is now put on Mr Wallace on a FAAB Sunday of all days. simply amazing

jim.s
Posts: 160
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 6:00 pm
Contact:

Brett Wallace position?

Post by jim.s » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:34 am

Tom,

He was listed as 1B,3B this morning, but it has been changed now.

User avatar
Tom Kessenich
Posts: 26046
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:00 pm
Contact:

Brett Wallace position?

Post by Tom Kessenich » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:05 am

He was listed at 3B/1B because that is how the information was given to us by STATS. We then manually program any changes for players to conform to NFBC eligibility rules. So Wallace's eligibility is now correct. I apologize for any delay with this.
Tom Kessenich
Manager of High Stakes Fantasy Games, SportsHub Technologies
Twitter - @TomKessenich

Post Reply