Brett Wallace position?
Brett Wallace position?
Brett Wallace is listed as 1B,3B. Similar question to one asked previously on Logan Morrison
- Tom Kessenich
- Posts: 26046
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:00 pm
- Contact:
Brett Wallace position?
Originally posted by jim.s:
Brett Wallace is listed as 1B,3B. Similar question to one asked previously on Logan Morrison Wallace played most of his games in the minors last year at 3B so that would be his position eligibility.
Brett Wallace is listed as 1B,3B. Similar question to one asked previously on Logan Morrison Wallace played most of his games in the minors last year at 3B so that would be his position eligibility.
Tom Kessenich
Manager of High Stakes Fantasy Games, SportsHub Technologies
Twitter - @TomKessenich
Manager of High Stakes Fantasy Games, SportsHub Technologies
Twitter - @TomKessenich
Brett Wallace position?
another day, another player where the position eligibility rules aren't being followed.
- Tom Kessenich
- Posts: 26046
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:00 pm
- Contact:
Brett Wallace position?
Mark, Wallace is listed at 3B because that is the position where he played the most games in the minors in 2009. His position eligibility is correct.
Tom Kessenich
Manager of High Stakes Fantasy Games, SportsHub Technologies
Twitter - @TomKessenich
Manager of High Stakes Fantasy Games, SportsHub Technologies
Twitter - @TomKessenich
Brett Wallace position?
Originally posted by Tom Kessenich:
Mark, Wallace is listed at 3B because that is the position where he played the most games in the minors in 2009. His position eligibility is correct. i understand the 3B eligibility. why is he showing up as 1B eligible??
Mark, Wallace is listed at 3B because that is the position where he played the most games in the minors in 2009. His position eligibility is correct. i understand the 3B eligibility. why is he showing up as 1B eligible??
- Tom Kessenich
- Posts: 26046
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:00 pm
- Contact:
Brett Wallace position?
Originally posted by Gekko:
quote:Originally posted by Tom Kessenich:
Mark, Wallace is listed at 3B because that is the position where he played the most games in the minors in 2009. His position eligibility is correct. i understand the 3B eligibility. why is he showing up as 1B eligible?? [/QUOTE]He shouldn't be showing as having 1B eligibility. I just checked and he's only listed as 3B/CI eligible which is correct.
quote:Originally posted by Tom Kessenich:
Mark, Wallace is listed at 3B because that is the position where he played the most games in the minors in 2009. His position eligibility is correct. i understand the 3B eligibility. why is he showing up as 1B eligible?? [/QUOTE]He shouldn't be showing as having 1B eligibility. I just checked and he's only listed as 3B/CI eligible which is correct.
Tom Kessenich
Manager of High Stakes Fantasy Games, SportsHub Technologies
Twitter - @TomKessenich
Manager of High Stakes Fantasy Games, SportsHub Technologies
Twitter - @TomKessenich
Brett Wallace position?
Originally posted by Tom Kessenich:
quote:Originally posted by Gekko:
quote:Originally posted by Tom Kessenich:
Mark, Wallace is listed at 3B because that is the position where he played the most games in the minors in 2009. His position eligibility is correct. i understand the 3B eligibility. why is he showing up as 1B eligible?? [/QUOTE]He shouldn't be showing as having 1B eligibility. I just checked and he's only listed as 3B/CI eligible which is correct. [/QUOTE]As the first poster noted, he was showing 3B AND 1B eligibility earlier today. I even noticed it. Someone at Fanball must have switched it sometime today.
In any event, I am happy the issue was resolved, but again, WHY are these position issues STILL coming up???
[ August 01, 2010, 01:31 PM: Message edited by: Gekko ]
quote:Originally posted by Gekko:
quote:Originally posted by Tom Kessenich:
Mark, Wallace is listed at 3B because that is the position where he played the most games in the minors in 2009. His position eligibility is correct. i understand the 3B eligibility. why is he showing up as 1B eligible?? [/QUOTE]He shouldn't be showing as having 1B eligibility. I just checked and he's only listed as 3B/CI eligible which is correct. [/QUOTE]As the first poster noted, he was showing 3B AND 1B eligibility earlier today. I even noticed it. Someone at Fanball must have switched it sometime today.
In any event, I am happy the issue was resolved, but again, WHY are these position issues STILL coming up???
[ August 01, 2010, 01:31 PM: Message edited by: Gekko ]
Brett Wallace position?
and because of the Fanball position problem EXTRA ATTENTION is now put on Mr Wallace on a FAAB Sunday of all days. simply amazing
Brett Wallace position?
Tom,
He was listed as 1B,3B this morning, but it has been changed now.
He was listed as 1B,3B this morning, but it has been changed now.
- Tom Kessenich
- Posts: 26046
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:00 pm
- Contact:
Brett Wallace position?
He was listed at 3B/1B because that is how the information was given to us by STATS. We then manually program any changes for players to conform to NFBC eligibility rules. So Wallace's eligibility is now correct. I apologize for any delay with this.
Tom Kessenich
Manager of High Stakes Fantasy Games, SportsHub Technologies
Twitter - @TomKessenich
Manager of High Stakes Fantasy Games, SportsHub Technologies
Twitter - @TomKessenich