FA question

Plymouth · Post by **Plymouth** » Tue Mar 02, 2004 3:25 am

How many free agents can a team pick up in one week? If a team bids say on three different players and wins all three bids, do they then waive three players from their roster and pick-up all three FA they were high bidder on? Thanks.

Greg Ambrosius · Post by **Greg Ambrosius** » Tue Mar 02, 2004 4:29 am

There is no limit on weekly free agent pickups. You will just be required to provide a drop with every pickup and you can keep bidding until your imaginary $1,000 FAAB is out. Hopefully you'll have such a good draft that you won't need to pick up 3-5 guys per week.

Jon_Ashton · Post by **Jon_Ashton** » Tue Mar 02, 2004 10:59 am

Remember also that you can make some bids conditional. That is, if you get FA#1, your winning bids for FA#2 and FA#3 are irrelevent (just a little FAAB money down the drain), if you only wanted FA#2 or FA#3 in case you missed out on FA#1.

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Tue Mar 02, 2004 11:15 am

Originally posted by Jon_Ashton:

Remember also that you can make some bids conditional. That is, if you get FA#1, your winning bids for FA#2 and FA#3 are irrelevent (just a little FAAB money down the drain), if you only wanted FA#2 or FA#3 in case you missed out on FA#1. I wonder if that post confused more people than it helped?

I'm not too big on grammer and sentence structure, but some owners really need to check themselves.

Jon_Ashton · Post by **Jon_Ashton** » Tue Mar 02, 2004 11:23 am

I can tell you're not big on "grammer" as you misspelled it. Yes, some owners should check themselves!

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Tue Mar 02, 2004 11:30 am

Originally posted by Jon_Ashton:

I can tell you're not big on "grammer" as you misspelled it. Yes, some owners should check themselves! I guess you don't know what sarcasm is either? Gotcha!!!

Boy, this is shaping up to be an entertaining day at the office tomorrow. The guys need a couple of good laughs once in a while. Thanks.

Jon_Ashton · Post by **Jon_Ashton** » Tue Mar 02, 2004 11:51 am

Your attempts at "sarcasm" are as weak as your other attempts on this board.

Re-read my Jeff Cirillo and Jack Wilson posts in your pathetic "Movin' On Up" thread, if you'd like to try to get a clue about sarcasm.

Next!

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Tue Mar 02, 2004 12:00 pm

Originally posted by Jon_Ashton:

Your attempts at "sarcasm" are as weak as your other attempts on this board.

Re-read my Jeff Cirillo and Jack Wilson posts in your pathetic "Movin' On Up" thread, if you'd like to try to get a clue about sarcasm.

Next! Very weak rebuttal....Jon. I expected more, but I should have known better. :rolleyes:

Jon_Ashton · Post by **Jon_Ashton** » Tue Mar 02, 2004 12:04 pm

Your lame lack of rebuttal was exactly what I would've expected from you.

As a pathetic gekko would say, "Next!"

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Tue Mar 02, 2004 12:09 pm

Originally posted by Jon_Ashton:

Your lame lack of rebuttal was exactly what I would've expected from you.

As a pathetic gekko would say, "Next!" Your posts are like a tail...always following your master around. Keep up the good work.

Jon_Ashton · Post by **Jon_Ashton** » Tue Mar 02, 2004 12:12 pm

Funny. Keep up the good work providing me with material for me to amuse the guys at work with tomorrow. Oh, I forgot, I'm not as cool as you are. I won't be able to share this with "my boys at the office" tomorrow.