Page 1 of 1
% starting - accuracy
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 7:54 pm
by Wire2Wire
Bobby Crosby is ON THE DL!
How is it that it shows 4.8% of the teams have him in their starting rosters.
Is this ACCURATE?
BOGUS or what? :rolleyes:
Have some teams given up already?
just can't believe it! Help me out here.
% starting - accuracy
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 11:00 am
by Spyhunter
well, perhaps they have no replacement?
What bugs me more is this:
Sexson, Richie 1B SEA - @Tex @Tex @Tex @Oak @Oak @Oak ActiveBench 1BCIUTL 95.2% 95.2%
Exactly which league doesn't have Richie Sexson?????
Spy
% starting - accuracy
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 11:48 am
by King of Queens
Originally posted by Spyhunter:
Exactly which league doesn't have Richie Sexson?????NL only leagues wouldn't have him.
% starting - accuracy
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 12:34 am
by Spyhunter
I don't know about that. I assumed that they took those out of the Total Universe of potential because I see many players with 100% owned and they obviously wouldn't be owned in the NL or the AL leagues!
Spy
% starting - accuracy
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 5:17 am
by Wire2Wire
Maybe we can get a clarification on this from our NFBC STAFF???
It is puzzling!
There should be some logical reasoning somewhere!
O_U_T
% starting - accuracy
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 12:35 pm
by bjoak
The repetitive recurrance of the number 95.2 is also rather eerie. I have about 10 guys marked at that percentage.
% starting - accuracy
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 2:13 pm
by viper
I'm sorry but what difference does it really make? The guys on pretty much every leagues rosters are over 90% and the one's not on many rosters are pretty much 20% or less. Maybe I'm missing the point.
% starting - accuracy
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 6:23 pm
by Wire2Wire
Viper, I guess we just need to hear there is some real reason for the variances. As anal as most of us are
We have to disect it it to its fullest extent or we would'nt be the fanatics NFBC has made us out to be!
All in all, we understand and if the auction leagues are messing our numbers up, so be it.
O>>>U>>>T
% starting - accuracy
Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2005 12:03 am
by viper
It couldn't be the AL-only or NL-only answer. If that was the case, then no one would be at 100%. I admit I am a bit curious but I am in other leagues where percentages are equally "confusing".
[ April 26, 2005, 06:06 AM: Message edited by: viper ]
% starting - accuracy
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 12:57 am
by Royal Pain
yeah, I see endy chavez and jason werth remain active for almost 5% of the teams. I was hoping this was true in my league, but alas, Chi #1 figured out that these guys have yet to play a game.
% starting - accuracy
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 3:13 am
by viper
the percentages shown would reflect numbers for 21 teams. It could be the 20 teams in the main event PLUS the ultimate draft league. Who knows.
