Runs Scored
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:17 am
Is it me, or is "Runs" as a category a little out of whack this year. For the NFBC, in 2004 and 2005, the team that garnered 80% of the available "Runs" points in the overall averaged about 1,121 (1,158 in '04 and 1,084 in '05). As expected, these numbers are slightly higher (56 and 32, respectively) than RBI's.
I am generally one of the balanced team advocates. Therefore I targeted my team to try and get at least 80% of the available points in all categories. RBI's seem to be tracking pretty much as expected, but Runs are different. At the end of Week 9, I was tracking right on target to get 1,121 Runs on my team this year (would actually like to be tracking a little higher given the September doldrums, but all in all I still have a good chance to finish on target). What gets me is that in the overall I am in 223 place as of today in the Runs category.
What am I missing? Is September so bad that I need to have 90% or 95% of my Runs by the end of August? If so, why does that not seem to be the case for RBI's, which are tracking much closer to the average?
Just looking for opinions....
I am generally one of the balanced team advocates. Therefore I targeted my team to try and get at least 80% of the available points in all categories. RBI's seem to be tracking pretty much as expected, but Runs are different. At the end of Week 9, I was tracking right on target to get 1,121 Runs on my team this year (would actually like to be tracking a little higher given the September doldrums, but all in all I still have a good chance to finish on target). What gets me is that in the overall I am in 223 place as of today in the Runs category.
What am I missing? Is September so bad that I need to have 90% or 95% of my Runs by the end of August? If so, why does that not seem to be the case for RBI's, which are tracking much closer to the average?
Just looking for opinions....