Main Event scoring questions
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 7:02 am
Since this appears to be a quieter time on the boards, may I ask a couple of newbie/satillite questions for the big guys in anticipation of possibly joining the big dance next year?
1. With regard to the league by league scoring that's posted. Since everyone pretty much has the same top, oh, 95% of the talent entered, is it fair to say the differences in scores occur only from the bottom 5% of players that may or may not be started for that particular time period?
(i.e., one league has Josh Hamilton and Sammy active while antoher may not?)
Wait, they get tougher.....
2. With regard to scoring for the Main event....
Am I correct in the impression that if you are in a "tougher" league, it actually makes it more difficult, vs. someone who is leading a lesser league and is able to accumulate a much better score? (Note: I am not suggesting a flaw in the scoring system, just trying to understand the nuances)
3. Additionally, are the league leaders the only ones who's score are considered? If I understand the scoring method correctly (and I may not), I see scenarios whereby someone finishing second in their league could actually finish higher (than their respective champion) if the raw scores are compared to the entire field as a whole.
Again, my son and I are first time satilliters who are eyeing next year and have been bouncing these question back and forth with pie-in-the-sky
anticipation.
Any light that anyone could shed would be appreciated...Tom/Greg??
1. With regard to the league by league scoring that's posted. Since everyone pretty much has the same top, oh, 95% of the talent entered, is it fair to say the differences in scores occur only from the bottom 5% of players that may or may not be started for that particular time period?
(i.e., one league has Josh Hamilton and Sammy active while antoher may not?)
Wait, they get tougher.....
2. With regard to scoring for the Main event....
Am I correct in the impression that if you are in a "tougher" league, it actually makes it more difficult, vs. someone who is leading a lesser league and is able to accumulate a much better score? (Note: I am not suggesting a flaw in the scoring system, just trying to understand the nuances)
3. Additionally, are the league leaders the only ones who's score are considered? If I understand the scoring method correctly (and I may not), I see scenarios whereby someone finishing second in their league could actually finish higher (than their respective champion) if the raw scores are compared to the entire field as a whole.
Again, my son and I are first time satilliters who are eyeing next year and have been bouncing these question back and forth with pie-in-the-sky
anticipation.
Any light that anyone could shed would be appreciated...Tom/Greg??