Page 1 of 1

Gekko New Batch

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 2:20 pm
by Gordon Gekko
Again, anyone faint of heart...do not read any further...this goes for

RotoGod

King of Queens

Baltic Squid

rotatorcff

Dyv

EddieJag

Spyhunter

KJ Duke

Plymouth



i fired up the mainframe tonight. here are the hitting results. the number following your name represents how many hitting points (out of the 975) you would get last year. enjoy!



RotoGod 655

King of Queens 619

Baltic Squid 617

rotatorcff 608

Dyv 556 (will be lower without Bonds)

EddieJag 512

Spyhunter 391

KJ Duke 386

Plymouth 381

Gekko New Batch

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 2:29 pm
by rotatorcff
Thanks, GG.

Gekko New Batch

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 2:32 pm
by Mankind
Gordon,

This is the team to rate.....

SEABASS NATION: LAS VEGAS League #8 Team #2



1. PUJOLS 1B (1)

2. LORETTA 2B (7)

3. O. CABRERA SS (6)

4. BLAYLOCK 3B (3)

5. SHEFFIELD OF (2)

6. C. PATTERSON OF (4)

7. C. JONES OF (5)

8. J. BURNITZ UTIL (16)

9. E. CHAVEZ OF (14)

10. D. DEJESUS OF (15)

11. LODUCA C (13)

12. Y. MOLINA (24)



MIDDLE & CORNER INFIELDERS:



M. BELLHORN (17)

B. MUELLER (20)

C. GUZMAN (26)

J. WILSON (28)



PITCHERS:



M. MULDER (8)

B. ZITO (9)

M. BUEHRLE (10)

OD. PEREZ (11)

D. WELLS (18)

B. LAWRENCE (19)

J. MARQUIS (21)

J. SUPPAN (23)

C. CAPUANO (26)

J. MESA (12)

Y. BRAZOBAN (22)

R. MADSON (25)

B. DONNELY (29)

L. AYALA (30)



LOOKS GOOD ON PAPER, PRAY FOR NO INJURIES, GOOD LUCK TO EVERYONE, PLAY BALL. "SEABASS NATION"

Gekko New Batch

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 2:33 pm
by King of Queens
Originally posted by Gordon Gekko:

King of Queens 619I guess that's pretty good. Gordon, when are you going to give us the mainframe total for your squad?

Gekko New Batch

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 2:58 pm
by Plymouth
Thank you Mr. Gekko, fortunately the boys will playing this year and not with last years numbers. I am not discouraged.

Gekko New Batch

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 2:58 pm
by bjoak
This is silly. Who cares what they hit last year? 3 year totals are far more relavent and what exactly did you enter for rookies? 0?



I know how my guys are going to do this year and I know how many NFBC points they equal, this year, so you don't have to bother doing my team. Thanks.

Gekko New Batch

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 3:10 pm
by Gordon Gekko
to clarify, the results are using this year's player projections for your team and simplying finding out where you would stack up against the 195 teams from last year. some may get it, others may not. no worry.



koq - i'm over 600, but not first. damn artie!!

Gekko New Batch

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 3:10 pm
by Gordon Gekko
Originally posted by bjoak:

I know how my guys are going to do this year and I know how many NFBC points they equal, this year, so you don't have to bother doing my team. Thanks. i ran your number. they were below 200, so i didn't even post them. sorry

Gekko New Batch

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 3:11 pm
by eddiejag
Hey im happy if its last years stats.

These guys were out or played a little.

sexson

santiago hurt all year

jordan hurt all year

hawpe 105 at bats

peralta minors

branyan 158 at bats

rios 426 at bats

chavez 475 at bats

sexson 90 at bats

boone bad year avg 250

Gekko New Batch

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 10:16 am
by Spyhunter
Thanks for the analysis, I find it interesting, even if I disagree. Question - whose projections are you using?



Also, what happend to pitching - hitting is only 1/2 the equation...



Just curious how many teams there were last year to have 975 be the max points?



Thanks in advance



Chris



[ March 23, 2005, 04:19 PM: Message edited by: Spyhunter ]

Gekko New Batch

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 11:01 am
by Bobby J
I think there were 195 teams last year

Gekko New Batch

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 5:09 pm
by Bandit
The question I have is when you're comparing 195 teams versus 300 teams the statistical advantage of undervalued players doing well and vice-versa becomes a lot less relavent.



Its a whole different game IMO. Way different.