Page 1 of 1
Gekko New Batch
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 2:20 pm
by Gordon Gekko
Again, anyone faint of heart...do not read any further...this goes for
RotoGod
King of Queens
Baltic Squid
rotatorcff
Dyv
EddieJag
Spyhunter
KJ Duke
Plymouth
i fired up the mainframe tonight. here are the hitting results. the number following your name represents how many hitting points (out of the 975) you would get last year. enjoy!
RotoGod 655
King of Queens 619
Baltic Squid 617
rotatorcff 608
Dyv 556 (will be lower without Bonds)
EddieJag 512
Spyhunter 391
KJ Duke 386
Plymouth 381
Gekko New Batch
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 2:29 pm
by rotatorcff
Thanks, GG.
Gekko New Batch
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 2:32 pm
by Mankind
Gordon,
This is the team to rate.....
SEABASS NATION: LAS VEGAS League #8 Team #2
1. PUJOLS 1B (1)
2. LORETTA 2B (7)
3. O. CABRERA SS (6)
4. BLAYLOCK 3B (3)
5. SHEFFIELD OF (2)
6. C. PATTERSON OF (4)
7. C. JONES OF (5)
8. J. BURNITZ UTIL (16)
9. E. CHAVEZ OF (14)
10. D. DEJESUS OF (15)
11. LODUCA C (13)
12. Y. MOLINA (24)
MIDDLE & CORNER INFIELDERS:
M. BELLHORN (17)
B. MUELLER (20)
C. GUZMAN (26)
J. WILSON (28)
PITCHERS:
M. MULDER (8)
B. ZITO (9)
M. BUEHRLE (10)
OD. PEREZ (11)
D. WELLS (18)
B. LAWRENCE (19)
J. MARQUIS (21)
J. SUPPAN (23)
C. CAPUANO (26)
J. MESA (12)
Y. BRAZOBAN (22)
R. MADSON (25)
B. DONNELY (29)
L. AYALA (30)
LOOKS GOOD ON PAPER, PRAY FOR NO INJURIES, GOOD LUCK TO EVERYONE, PLAY BALL. "SEABASS NATION"
Gekko New Batch
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 2:33 pm
by King of Queens
Originally posted by Gordon Gekko:
King of Queens 619I guess that's pretty good. Gordon, when are you going to give us the mainframe total for your squad?
Gekko New Batch
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 2:58 pm
by Plymouth
Thank you Mr. Gekko, fortunately the boys will playing this year and not with last years numbers. I am not discouraged.
Gekko New Batch
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 2:58 pm
by bjoak
This is silly. Who cares what they hit last year? 3 year totals are far more relavent and what exactly did you enter for rookies? 0?
I know how my guys are going to do this year and I know how many NFBC points they equal, this year, so you don't have to bother doing my team. Thanks.
Gekko New Batch
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 3:10 pm
by Gordon Gekko
to clarify, the results are using this year's player projections for your team and simplying finding out where you would stack up against the 195 teams from last year. some may get it, others may not. no worry.
koq - i'm over 600, but not first. damn artie!!
Gekko New Batch
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 3:10 pm
by Gordon Gekko
Originally posted by bjoak:
I know how my guys are going to do this year and I know how many NFBC points they equal, this year, so you don't have to bother doing my team. Thanks. i ran your number. they were below 200, so i didn't even post them. sorry
Gekko New Batch
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 3:11 pm
by eddiejag
Hey im happy if its last years stats.
These guys were out or played a little.
sexson
santiago hurt all year
jordan hurt all year
hawpe 105 at bats
peralta minors
branyan 158 at bats
rios 426 at bats
chavez 475 at bats
sexson 90 at bats
boone bad year avg 250
Gekko New Batch
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 10:16 am
by Spyhunter
Thanks for the analysis, I find it interesting, even if I disagree. Question - whose projections are you using?
Also, what happend to pitching - hitting is only 1/2 the equation...
Just curious how many teams there were last year to have 975 be the max points?
Thanks in advance
Chris
[ March 23, 2005, 04:19 PM: Message edited by: Spyhunter ]
Gekko New Batch
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 11:01 am
by Bobby J
I think there were 195 teams last year
Gekko New Batch
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 5:09 pm
by Bandit
The question I have is when you're comparing 195 teams versus 300 teams the statistical advantage of undervalued players doing well and vice-versa becomes a lot less relavent.
Its a whole different game IMO. Way different.