Need a second pair of eyes
Need a second pair of eyes
Just curious as to everyone's thoughts. Same rules/scoring as NFBC.
C Lieberthal
C Jav. Valentin
1 Helton
2 Giles
ss Nomar
3b Lowell
mi Counsell
ci Dimitri
of Crawford
of Andruw
of Bonds (6th)
of Dye
of Encarnacion
dh Broussard
p Randy (5th)
p Vazquez
p Oliver Perez
p Escobar
p Clement
p Reitsma
p Turnbow
p Weathers
p MacDougal
b Hinske
b R. Adams
b Zaun
b Bigbie
b Benson
b bentancourt
Any comments will be appreciated
C Lieberthal
C Jav. Valentin
1 Helton
2 Giles
ss Nomar
3b Lowell
mi Counsell
ci Dimitri
of Crawford
of Andruw
of Bonds (6th)
of Dye
of Encarnacion
dh Broussard
p Randy (5th)
p Vazquez
p Oliver Perez
p Escobar
p Clement
p Reitsma
p Turnbow
p Weathers
p MacDougal
b Hinske
b R. Adams
b Zaun
b Bigbie
b Benson
b bentancourt
Any comments will be appreciated
"When your strategy is deep and far reaching, what you gain by your calculations can allow you to win before you fight."
- Captain Hook
- Posts: 2066
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:00 pm
- Location: Valley of the Sun
- Contact:
Need a second pair of eyes
At a quick glance - if Bonds doesn't come back fully this team is toast.
Lowell is also a big question mark for you.
The pitching has a chance although Clement could sink that boat and you don't have much in the way of backup.
Lowell is also a big question mark for you.
The pitching has a chance although Clement could sink that boat and you don't have much in the way of backup.
Need a second pair of eyes
Three years ago, or more, this would have been a kick-arse team.
On my tombstone-
Wait! I never had the perfect draft!
Wait! I never had the perfect draft!
-
- Posts: 2400
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 6:00 pm
- Contact:
Need a second pair of eyes
I have to agree with the first 2 guys- who by the way unlike me actually know what they are talking about.
The offense has no upside to it but is solid in most places. The pitching is a house of cards. I do not have a crystal ball on which pitchers will fold on that team but more than a few will.
If you are drafting in the main event my advice would be to not get as caught up in the big name guys who may be fading a bit.
BTW- I like Bonds as a 6th round pick especially in a winner take all league. I drafted my winner take all leagues a bit differently than I will the main event because IMO you have to take a few more risks.
[ March 01, 2006, 09:27 AM: Message edited by: Chest Rockwell ]
The offense has no upside to it but is solid in most places. The pitching is a house of cards. I do not have a crystal ball on which pitchers will fold on that team but more than a few will.
If you are drafting in the main event my advice would be to not get as caught up in the big name guys who may be fading a bit.
BTW- I like Bonds as a 6th round pick especially in a winner take all league. I drafted my winner take all leagues a bit differently than I will the main event because IMO you have to take a few more risks.
[ March 01, 2006, 09:27 AM: Message edited by: Chest Rockwell ]
Need a second pair of eyes
I truly believe Lowell will rebound to somewhere between '04 and '03 numbers. I've watched him play alot and he needed to get out of Fla big time. I think I should have enough power and speed to keep me competitive. No doubt I'll need to find a starter via FAAB to round out that rotation.
"When your strategy is deep and far reaching, what you gain by your calculations can allow you to win before you fight."
- Edwards Kings
- Posts: 5909
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 6:00 pm
- Location: Duluth, Georgia
Need a second pair of eyes
Every team has if's of course, but the weakness to me is are the other categories strong enough to make up for below the middle of the pack Wins and K's (I am not sure five SP's even with Escobar, Randy, and Oliver will get you the K's you need even to make 80% in the category). Three second tier closers (if you consider Turnbow a top tier) and Turnbow will not give you great uplift in ERA/WHIP especially with Weathers and MacDougal.
I like your offense, but there is a lot of age in it.
A lot of potential (don't they all in the beginning) but risky with age/injury risks and closer strategy with people who do not have strong grips on their jobs.
These reviews always sounds like your being trashed, but I hope you do not take it that way. Just an opinion.
I like your offense, but there is a lot of age in it.
A lot of potential (don't they all in the beginning) but risky with age/injury risks and closer strategy with people who do not have strong grips on their jobs.
These reviews always sounds like your being trashed, but I hope you do not take it that way. Just an opinion.

Baseball is a slow, boring, complex, cerebral game that doesn't lend itself to histrionics. You 'take in' a baseball game, something odd to say about a football or basketball game, with the clock running and the bodies flying.
Charles Krauthammer
Charles Krauthammer
-
- Posts: 4317
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:00 pm
- Contact:
Need a second pair of eyes
Originally posted by TheKing:
Any comments will be appreciated 4 out of 10 stars. i expected better.
Any comments will be appreciated 4 out of 10 stars. i expected better.
-
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 6:00 pm
- Contact:
Need a second pair of eyes
First there was King of Queens.
Then came Edwards Kings.
Now we have TheKing.
There are just too many Kings around here -- it's getting confusing to the common message board reader. Perhaps a new moniker can be created for the newcomer(s).
Then came Edwards Kings.
Now we have TheKing.
There are just too many Kings around here -- it's getting confusing to the common message board reader. Perhaps a new moniker can be created for the newcomer(s).
Need a second pair of eyes
Originally posted by Gordon Gekko:
quote:Originally posted by TheKing:
Any comments will be appreciated 4 out of 10 stars. i expected better. [/QUOTE]I apologize if I didn't live up to your expectations. Good thing this was just a tune up...
quote:Originally posted by TheKing:
Any comments will be appreciated 4 out of 10 stars. i expected better. [/QUOTE]I apologize if I didn't live up to your expectations. Good thing this was just a tune up...
"When your strategy is deep and far reaching, what you gain by your calculations can allow you to win before you fight."
-
- Posts: 4317
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:00 pm
- Contact:
Need a second pair of eyes
Originally posted by TheKing:
I apologize if I didn't live up to your expectations. Good thing this was just a tune up... you are forgiven.
yes, good thing.
I apologize if I didn't live up to your expectations. Good thing this was just a tune up... you are forgiven.
yes, good thing.
Need a second pair of eyes
Question for Gekko. Please answer honestly. If you've drafted proven, reliable players with your first 5 picks, in what round does drafting Bonds become appealing?
Obviously, a winner-take-all format is a bit different than the main event.
Obviously, a winner-take-all format is a bit different than the main event.
"When your strategy is deep and far reaching, what you gain by your calculations can allow you to win before you fight."
-
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 6:00 pm
- Contact:
Need a second pair of eyes
Hey King #3,
Was this a 15 team draft?
What pick were you?
Was this a 15 team draft?
What pick were you?
Need a second pair of eyes
Yeah, 15 teams. I was #7. I went Crawford/Helton.
"When your strategy is deep and far reaching, what you gain by your calculations can allow you to win before you fight."
-
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 6:00 pm
- Contact:
Need a second pair of eyes
Originally posted by TheKing:
Yeah, 15 teams. I was #7. I went Crawford/Helton. Helton with the 24th pick is nice.
I took him last year with the 7th pick.
My how things change.
Yeah, 15 teams. I was #7. I went Crawford/Helton. Helton with the 24th pick is nice.
I took him last year with the 7th pick.
My how things change.
- Joe Sambito
- Posts: 931
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 6:00 pm
Need a second pair of eyes
Too many questions in the pitching staff. I think the offense is quite solid, though. A much better constructed offense than the pancho thread, but the staff, you need too many things to go right. If I were you I would be concentrating heavily on arms early on, on the waiver wire.
"Everyone is born right-handed, only the greatest overcome it."
Need a second pair of eyes
Originally posted by Joe Sambito:
Too many questions in the pitching staff. I think the offense is quite solid, though. A much better constructed offense than the pancho thread, but the staff, you need too many things to go right. If I were you I would be concentrating heavily on arms early on, on the waiver wire. Agreed. Much like an auction league where most people devote more of their budget to hitting, I knew going into the draft that I wasn't going to land any of the big stud arms. Starters went early and often (Johan went #3 and Harden went in the second!!). I was happy to get Randy in the 5th. Later in the draft I focused on guys with high k potential on good teams. Vazquez, Escobar, Clement- if these guys can put it together they could very well be 15+ game winners with close to 200 k's.
As in every year, there will be free agent starters that make an impact. Rest assured I'll be on the lookout.
Too many questions in the pitching staff. I think the offense is quite solid, though. A much better constructed offense than the pancho thread, but the staff, you need too many things to go right. If I were you I would be concentrating heavily on arms early on, on the waiver wire. Agreed. Much like an auction league where most people devote more of their budget to hitting, I knew going into the draft that I wasn't going to land any of the big stud arms. Starters went early and often (Johan went #3 and Harden went in the second!!). I was happy to get Randy in the 5th. Later in the draft I focused on guys with high k potential on good teams. Vazquez, Escobar, Clement- if these guys can put it together they could very well be 15+ game winners with close to 200 k's.
As in every year, there will be free agent starters that make an impact. Rest assured I'll be on the lookout.
"When your strategy is deep and far reaching, what you gain by your calculations can allow you to win before you fight."
-
- Posts: 4317
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:00 pm
- Contact:
Need a second pair of eyes
Originally posted by TheKing:
Question for Gekko. Please answer honestly. If you've drafted proven, reliable players with your first 5 picks, in what round does drafting Bonds become appealing?
Obviously, a winner-take-all format is a bit different than the main event. there's a bonds strategy, and i'd rather not reveal my cards now. sorry TheKing
Question for Gekko. Please answer honestly. If you've drafted proven, reliable players with your first 5 picks, in what round does drafting Bonds become appealing?
Obviously, a winner-take-all format is a bit different than the main event. there's a bonds strategy, and i'd rather not reveal my cards now. sorry TheKing
Need a second pair of eyes
Here's the only Bonds strategy you need:
If you can get Bonds in the 6th or later, he will be the steal of the draft.
If you can get Bonds in the 6th or later, he will be the steal of the draft.
"When your strategy is deep and far reaching, what you gain by your calculations can allow you to win before you fight."
-
- Posts: 4317
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:00 pm
- Contact:
Need a second pair of eyes
Originally posted by TheKing:
If you can get Bonds in the 6th or later, he will be the steal of the draft. that's certainly a strategy.
If you can get Bonds in the 6th or later, he will be the steal of the draft. that's certainly a strategy.
-
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 6:00 pm
- Contact:
Need a second pair of eyes
TheKing/Joe -- I don't see you signed up for the main event. What's the hold-up?
Need a second pair of eyes
Still trying to a find a partner. My partner from last year is getting married in September and is taking this year off.
"When your strategy is deep and far reaching, what you gain by your calculations can allow you to win before you fight."
-
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 6:00 pm
- Contact:
Need a second pair of eyes
Originally posted by TheKing:
My partner from last year is getting married in September and is taking this year off. Lame excuse for your partner--the wedding is in September!! Are the flower arrangements keeping him busy this March?
My partner from last year is getting married in September and is taking this year off. Lame excuse for your partner--the wedding is in September!! Are the flower arrangements keeping him busy this March?
Need a second pair of eyes
Its more of a money thing. We're both 25 and not where we'll eventually be financially. I'm confident though. Made some rookie mistakes last year that we learned from. We were used to playing in points/head to head format. Way different here. Couldn't believe how quick relievers and speed went last year. Looks like speed is going quick again this year, but if your patient you can nab a nifty closer or two later in the draft.
"When your strategy is deep and far reaching, what you gain by your calculations can allow you to win before you fight."
-
- Posts: 4317
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:00 pm
- Contact:
Need a second pair of eyes
Originally posted by TheKing:
Its more of a money thing. We're both 25 and not where we'll eventually be financially. theking - what's your name? i'd like to see your draft from last year.
Its more of a money thing. We're both 25 and not where we'll eventually be financially. theking - what's your name? i'd like to see your draft from last year.
Need a second pair of eyes
GG,
Greg is considering opening up another sattelite league for $250. I'm in. Please join. We can critique each other throughout the draft and you can point out the mistakes I make as I make them.
Thanks.
Greg is considering opening up another sattelite league for $250. I'm in. Please join. We can critique each other throughout the draft and you can point out the mistakes I make as I make them.
Thanks.
"When your strategy is deep and far reaching, what you gain by your calculations can allow you to win before you fight."