Page 1 of 1

Manny trade

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:42 am
by Sheep
to LAD, Boston got Bay.



Other details?

Manny trade

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:00 am
by bjoak

Manny trade

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:18 am
by headhunters
but what about andrew jones? juan pierre, andy either? that will be one expensive bench. what a great gm -200 million and they are 1 over .500. if they played in al they would be 15 under. nice job.

Manny trade

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:34 am
by Edwards Kings
"It's a pueter gray sky in Chavez Ravine..."



Either is the loser on this one.

Manny trade

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:35 am
by Captain Hook
I don't think so Wayne - I think its Andruw and Pierre to the bench - Manny in LF; Kemp in CF and Ethier in RF

Manny trade

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:53 am
by JohnZ
Originally posted by Captain Hook:

I don't think so Wayne - I think its Andruw and Pierre to the bench - Manny in LF; Kemp in CF and Ethier in RF I like this much better :D



Makes more sense as Manny has to play LF.

Manny trade

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:30 pm
by Edwards Kings
Originally posted by Captain Hook:

I don't think so Wayne - I think its Andruw and Pierre to the bench - Manny in LF; Kemp in CF and Ethier in RF Careful...you are thinking logically.



That is a very expensive bench. I think Ethier is losing two or three starts a week.

Manny trade

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:34 pm
by bjoak
Originally posted by Captain Hook:

I don't think so Wayne - I think its Andruw and Pierre to the bench - Manny in LF; Kemp in CF and Ethier in RF That would make the most sense for sure, but the Dodger's aren't exactly famous for having good sense. That in mind, it's Pierre and Ethier to the bench with Pierre getting way too many starts and proving once again that anyone who drafted a player from the Dodger's outfield was way too hung over on draft day.



From a baseball standpoint I can't see how it was a bad thing for any of the teams involved.



[ July 31, 2008, 06:35 PM: Message edited by: bjoak ]

Manny trade

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:38 pm
by bjoak
Though when you think about it, LA will distribute their playing time so poorly that if they just played the optimal lineup, they'd have gotten the same production as they will with Manny and from that standpoint they gave up prospects for nothing. :eek:

Manny trade

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:44 pm
by Edwards Kings
Not related to Manny, but with Griffey in Chicago, does that mean that Patterson is the starter in CF again?



Shudder.... :eek: