Free Agents

Post Reply
DOUGHBOYS
Posts: 13091
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 6:00 pm

Free Agents

Post by DOUGHBOYS » Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:02 am

No matter who signed Teixeira, he was going to be the best sign at just about any price. The Yankees realized that late, but they got their man.

Other good signings...



San Francisco doesen't do it often but they've made two good signings. Jeremy Affeldt is a good middle relief addition especially against lefties. His control was a question mark earlier in his career, but he has made great strides in fixing that problem.

Lets face it, the Giants didn't sign handsome Randy Johnson to help coach their young staff. Johnson should be a great addition to the rotation though, and will have a chance to be the last 300 game winner in baseball.

Felipe Lopez could be a very good signing for Arizona, they'll miss Orlando Hudson's defense, but Lopez, on the cheap, should give them close to the same offense.

Furcal for 30 million over three years is a steal. Without the recession, he gets four, maybe five years. The Dodgers would have had a gaping hole without this signing.

The Phillies, affectively, traded Pat Burrell for recent signee Raul Ibanez. Manuel shuddered at the thought of Burrell in left field. While Ibanez is below average defensively, he is not lost in left field. Ibanez is a blue collar player and should help the Phillies defend their title.



The bad signs....



The worst, Kyle Farnsworth gets 9.25 million from a team that cannot afford this bad of a signing, the Kansas City Royals. A set-up man with a WHIP of 1.53 and he gives up an over .300 average to RIGHT handed batters. A reliever like this can be had for the minimum. KC really goofed on this one.

Edgar Renteria. The Giants can't go through an off season without at least one bad signing. Really besides a little more in the power stats, I don't see much more out of Renteria than they could have expected out of Vizquel over a full year. I expect disagreement with that sentence, but I'll go even further and say that Vizquel is still the better defensive shortstop. 18.5 mil for two years won't haunt the Giants, but this is not a good sign.

I'll lump Sabathia,Burnett, and Dempster together here. Unless they are signing a young franchise pitcher such as Lincecum right now, owners should stay away from multi-year contracts with pitchers. They're ludicrous. They're expensive. They're wasteful.

Unless a team gets lucky with a Maddux or Glavine type who seem to keep injuries at a minimum, the odds are that they will not get their money's worth.

Dempster and Burnett, especially, do not have a previous good track record. Heck, really, I would rather sign Smoltz or Prior to a one year deal and hope for the best. If they blow out a rotater, it was a one year gamble and not five.

I start these posts with the intention of a few lines and it turns into a novel.

Sorry for the length. :(
On my tombstone-
Wait! I never had the perfect draft!

DOUGHBOYS
Posts: 13091
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 6:00 pm

Free Agents

Post by DOUGHBOYS » Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am

Oh, by the way. If the market shrivels up even more for Manny, I can see the Yankees signing him to a deal.

The Dodgers seem to be playing it very cozy right now with not much public competition from other teams. Colletti already had one near miss signing with Furcal, he may not be as lucky with Manny. If they do play too hard to get with Manny, it wouldn't surprise me at all to see another Yankee signing.

A good one too, since it'll be for just two or three years.



[ December 30, 2008, 10:22 AM: Message edited by: DOUGHBOYS ]
On my tombstone-
Wait! I never had the perfect draft!

headhunters
Posts: 1976
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 6:00 pm

Free Agents

Post by headhunters » Tue Dec 30, 2008 6:35 am

manny fits with the yanks, tex does not- because it is obvious they are trying to have the worst defense for the $ in the history of baseball. it won't be close. 300 million for 7 bad defenders and tex. good thing they didn't spend a lot on pitching to go with that awfull defense. i hope manny goes to the dodgers. they will win the division with 30 million in outfield $ sitting on the bench- but they will win.

bjoak
Posts: 2564
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 6:00 pm

Free Agents

Post by bjoak » Tue Dec 30, 2008 7:21 am

Originally posted by headhunters:

manny fits with the yanks, tex does not- because it is obvious they are trying to have the worst defense for the $ in the history of baseball. it won't be close. 300 million for 7 bad defenders and tex. good thing they didn't spend a lot on pitching to go with that awfull defense. i hope manny goes to the dodgers. they will win the division with 30 million in outfield $ sitting on the bench- but they will win. Did someone say defense? ;) While I agree with everything you said in principle (aside from that the Yanks payroll is much closer to 200 million), the Yankees worst defender by far was Giambi and they are replacing him with Tex who is actually quite good. Looking at Dewan's team numbers for this year, they may have been making as many as half of their bad plays at first base. They will still be a bad defensive team, but they should be bottom 10 instead of dead last with a bullet and that is one of their most significant upgrades of the offseason. Unless, of course, they ruin it by signing Manny.



::back to muttering about the possibility that Giambi will be manning first base for the A's next season::
Chance favors the prepared mind.

headhunters
Posts: 1976
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 6:00 pm

Free Agents

Post by headhunters » Tue Dec 30, 2008 7:29 am

that is why i said tex does not fit. i am pretty sure they are going to dh him and play damon at 1st- that would work- would it not? posada at 1st and tex catching? funny- they sign a guy named cash for the minimum- he might be the catcher. there is a joke there somewhere.

Post Reply