The Media and Matt Harvey
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 11:09 am
Sometimes...no... a lot of times, the media misses the real story.
Last night I was watching the World Series.
It seemed each anal(there's a reason for that prefix)yst, was trying to top each other in whether Matt Harvey would come out to pitch the ninth inning.
Once he did, they expounded that this was the 'right thing'.
When walking the leadoff hitter, backpeddling was heard. Then, when Hosmer hits a double, they went back to questioning whether Harvey should have started the ninth inning.
Analyst are never wrong. They can go back and say, "Yeah, but" to explain anything said prior. Managers are not afforded that opportunity.
To me, the story was lost on these horrible analysts. To me, it didn't matter whether Harvey strikes out the side in the ninth inning or had the outcome that happened.
The story to me was that Matt Harvey WANTED to come out and pitch the ninth inning.
Earlier in the season, the wicked witch of baseball, Scott Boras, caught Harvey's ear and told him that his innings should be limited.
A tact that worked for another client, Steven Strasburg and his General Manager.
That General Manager thinking that the Nationals would be making plenty of post season appearances with Strasburg.
How's that working out for you?
It seemed Harvey had mixed emotions. At first, he seemed to take the wicked witch's words to heart.
But, as the Mets season began to continue in good ways, his competitiveness and doing the 'right thing' overcame the wicked witch's spell.
Good for Matt Harvey.
Harveys first eight innings were magical. He held down the eventual World Series champs with ease for eight innings.
It is too bad that analysts made Collins decision in whether to leave him in the game or not, their story.
First and foremost in Harvey's mind was to do what he did best.
He wanted the ball and to Hell with those who questioned it, and a big screw you to the wicked witch of the east.
Major props, Matt Harvey.
It's too bad you didn't get that same recognition on National television.
Last night I was watching the World Series.
It seemed each anal(there's a reason for that prefix)yst, was trying to top each other in whether Matt Harvey would come out to pitch the ninth inning.
Once he did, they expounded that this was the 'right thing'.
When walking the leadoff hitter, backpeddling was heard. Then, when Hosmer hits a double, they went back to questioning whether Harvey should have started the ninth inning.
Analyst are never wrong. They can go back and say, "Yeah, but" to explain anything said prior. Managers are not afforded that opportunity.
To me, the story was lost on these horrible analysts. To me, it didn't matter whether Harvey strikes out the side in the ninth inning or had the outcome that happened.
The story to me was that Matt Harvey WANTED to come out and pitch the ninth inning.
Earlier in the season, the wicked witch of baseball, Scott Boras, caught Harvey's ear and told him that his innings should be limited.
A tact that worked for another client, Steven Strasburg and his General Manager.
That General Manager thinking that the Nationals would be making plenty of post season appearances with Strasburg.
How's that working out for you?
It seemed Harvey had mixed emotions. At first, he seemed to take the wicked witch's words to heart.
But, as the Mets season began to continue in good ways, his competitiveness and doing the 'right thing' overcame the wicked witch's spell.
Good for Matt Harvey.
Harveys first eight innings were magical. He held down the eventual World Series champs with ease for eight innings.
It is too bad that analysts made Collins decision in whether to leave him in the game or not, their story.
First and foremost in Harvey's mind was to do what he did best.
He wanted the ball and to Hell with those who questioned it, and a big screw you to the wicked witch of the east.
Major props, Matt Harvey.
It's too bad you didn't get that same recognition on National television.