When More is Less
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:41 am
What pitcher has thrown the most innings over the last seven years?
Before giving the answer, is this a positive or a negative?
It used to be that baseball fans were enamored with 'iron men'. Look at all the glory that Lou Gehrig and Cal Ripken received.
Cy Young records will never be touched, because hardly any Starter reaches the eighth inning any longer.
In fantasy baseball, we love durability. We like knowing that a player will be in the lineup every day.
That a pitcher will take the ball every fifth day.
At the same time, when do we see durability, itself, as a negative?
With pitchers, the most important statistic from the previous year has become a statistic that is not one of the five roto categories.
It is innings pitched.
If a pitcher throws too many innings during the previous year, we fear that injury may bite him this year.
If throwing too few innings, we fear that he'll be under an innings limit.
180-200 innings pitched has become the sweet spot.
As fantasy players, we don't reward a pitcher for leading his team into the playoffs and especially the World Series.
In fact, we'll nick him on our lists.
All he has done is put more innings on his arm.
Jon Lester, Jake Arrieta, and Corey Kluber the chief culprits last year.
ADP has been kind to these three during Draft Championship leagues. I believe that when the Big Drafts are held, those ADP's will not hold up.
Prior to last year, seven pitchers threw 220 regular season innings.
1 Clayton Kershaw 232.2
2 Dallas Keuchel 232.0
3 Jake Arrieta 229.0
4 Max Scherzer 228.2
5 Zack Greinke 222.2
6 Corey Kluber 222.0
7 David Price 220.1
Of these pitchers, only Scherzer and Kluber followed up with a more successful campaign in 2016.
Last year, six pitchers threw 220 innings.
1 David Price 230.0
2 Max Scherzer 228.1
3 Justin Verlander 227.2
4 Madison Bumgarner 226.2
Chris Sale 226.2
6 Rick Porcello 223.0
Price and Scherzer already having bad news,
I am not suggesting that these pitchers will not do well this season or that 220 innings is some sort of magic number.
Far from it.
In fact, both years, Johnny Cueto has been just under the threshold and has performed well.
More so, I am looking at these innings as a negative instead of a positive. Owning a 220 inning pitcher in season, much preferable to drafting one that threw 220+ the year before.
David Price is the answer to the first line of this post.
Price has AVERAGED 219 innings over the last seven years.
Some might say that Price was overdue for a hiccup.
The problem for us drafters is that we have no idea when a malady will hit. Maybe Price's sub par year was a harbinger for the injury this year? But we'd just be guessing.
Is it worse to draft a pitcher who has averaged 219 innings a year like David Price?
Or is it worse to draft a pitcher like Rick Porcello who threw 220 innings for the first time and threw 50 innings more in 2016 than 2015?
I don't know.
Our hobby relies more and more on luck with each passing year. Especially in considering pitching.
Starters tend to throw six innings and call it a day.
This leaves the category of Wins more up to the pitchers offense and bullpen, than the Starting Pitcher himself.
Closers have almost a 50% turnover in that the Closers that go into Spring Training with the job have a 50% chance of ending the year with the same job.
And fantasy baseball drafters?
We're looking at previous durability in a pitcher as a negative.
Our landscape is changing before our eyes.
Before giving the answer, is this a positive or a negative?
It used to be that baseball fans were enamored with 'iron men'. Look at all the glory that Lou Gehrig and Cal Ripken received.
Cy Young records will never be touched, because hardly any Starter reaches the eighth inning any longer.
In fantasy baseball, we love durability. We like knowing that a player will be in the lineup every day.
That a pitcher will take the ball every fifth day.
At the same time, when do we see durability, itself, as a negative?
With pitchers, the most important statistic from the previous year has become a statistic that is not one of the five roto categories.
It is innings pitched.
If a pitcher throws too many innings during the previous year, we fear that injury may bite him this year.
If throwing too few innings, we fear that he'll be under an innings limit.
180-200 innings pitched has become the sweet spot.
As fantasy players, we don't reward a pitcher for leading his team into the playoffs and especially the World Series.
In fact, we'll nick him on our lists.
All he has done is put more innings on his arm.
Jon Lester, Jake Arrieta, and Corey Kluber the chief culprits last year.
ADP has been kind to these three during Draft Championship leagues. I believe that when the Big Drafts are held, those ADP's will not hold up.
Prior to last year, seven pitchers threw 220 regular season innings.
1 Clayton Kershaw 232.2
2 Dallas Keuchel 232.0
3 Jake Arrieta 229.0
4 Max Scherzer 228.2
5 Zack Greinke 222.2
6 Corey Kluber 222.0
7 David Price 220.1
Of these pitchers, only Scherzer and Kluber followed up with a more successful campaign in 2016.
Last year, six pitchers threw 220 innings.
1 David Price 230.0
2 Max Scherzer 228.1
3 Justin Verlander 227.2
4 Madison Bumgarner 226.2
Chris Sale 226.2
6 Rick Porcello 223.0
Price and Scherzer already having bad news,
I am not suggesting that these pitchers will not do well this season or that 220 innings is some sort of magic number.
Far from it.
In fact, both years, Johnny Cueto has been just under the threshold and has performed well.
More so, I am looking at these innings as a negative instead of a positive. Owning a 220 inning pitcher in season, much preferable to drafting one that threw 220+ the year before.
David Price is the answer to the first line of this post.
Price has AVERAGED 219 innings over the last seven years.
Some might say that Price was overdue for a hiccup.
The problem for us drafters is that we have no idea when a malady will hit. Maybe Price's sub par year was a harbinger for the injury this year? But we'd just be guessing.
Is it worse to draft a pitcher who has averaged 219 innings a year like David Price?
Or is it worse to draft a pitcher like Rick Porcello who threw 220 innings for the first time and threw 50 innings more in 2016 than 2015?
I don't know.
Our hobby relies more and more on luck with each passing year. Especially in considering pitching.
Starters tend to throw six innings and call it a day.
This leaves the category of Wins more up to the pitchers offense and bullpen, than the Starting Pitcher himself.
Closers have almost a 50% turnover in that the Closers that go into Spring Training with the job have a 50% chance of ending the year with the same job.
And fantasy baseball drafters?
We're looking at previous durability in a pitcher as a negative.
Our landscape is changing before our eyes.