Pitchers and Podcasters
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2020 9:32 am
I've played in the NFBC for a very, very long time. Every year about this time, I have already semi-formulated a plan for the Main Event.
I try to combine 'smart' picks or what the draft allows me along with players that I will vault ahead of ADP because I believe ADP missed on these players.
This year, I believe I have my offense aligned.
Pitching?
No clue.
Podcasters, writers, so-called 'experts'...they always seem to have a plan, don't they?
The problem being that most of these fellas are slaves to recency bias and track records.
Max Scherzer is ranked very high by ADP and these experts.
What they see is a track record and a good year last year.
What I see is a great pitcher who may have seen his last fully healthy year.
There is no worse pick to make then selecting somebody like Scherzer, ignoring the signs from last year, only to fall victim to another year of ouches.
Does deGrom get Wins?
Does Cole adjust in NY?
Does Flaherty match the last half of last year or the first half?
Kershaw hurt,,,again?
Bueller pick up the slack?
Have we seen the last of dominant Chris Sale?
Ask a podcaster! They know. I sure as Hell don't.
Most years, I have a list of pitchers that will beat ADP.
I have one for this year too, but it's the smallest damned list I've ever had.
Combine this with Managers being 'happy' to get five innings from Starters and our job is all the harder.
Heck, even with Closers, we're a little screwed.
Josh Hader is the first Closer off the board. Think Hader is 'safe'? Consider this....
1. Hader was only a Closer because of injury last year.
2. The Brewers would rather use him as a 'Utility reliever'.
3. Hader could be traded to a team like the Yankees, where more than likely, he would not Close.
Don't you love pitching?
Last year, the first two Closers off the NFBC Boards were Edwin Diaz and Blake Treinen.
How'd that work out for us?
And believe me, every podcaster, every writer, and every 'expert' was telling us that Diaz and Treinen were as 'safe as it gets'.
Uh huh.
This year, not one pitcher is 'safe'.
From Gerritt Cole to Ivan Nova, no pitcher is truly 'safe'.
But those podcasters, writers, and experts think they have the answers.
Regurgitating recency bias and past history, and Voila!,,,,Their lists are finished.
Each year gets harder for us because we see less of these Starters.
A few years ago, Corey Kluber was the last Starter to average seven innings a start.
Now, Starters are having problems averaging even six innings.
Sonny Gray is a popular pick this year. He averaged 5 2/3 innings a Start last year.
Gray Started 31 Games. He threw seven innings in a game just three times. Three!
Max Fried averaged barely five innings.
That's only right.
Because the Braves babied him.
In 33 games, Fried threw 100 pitches just three times.
If wanting more pitches per game and not afraid of injury, draft a an old war horse.
Pitchers like Verlander, Scherzer, and Bumgarner have pitched long enough that they can tell the Manager they are throwing another inning.
We like innings.
It means strike out chances increase.
It means if behind, another chance for their team to score and get a Win for that pitcher.
For us, the odd number of 4 2/3 drives us crazy.
We are seeing it more and more because Starters thresholds and standards have lowered.
Managers have fresh arms and they love showing how smart they are by using them.
It could be worse this year with the 26-man roster.
And yet, these podcasters, writers, and experts know who to choose among pitchers.
And you know what's scary?
There are more podcasters, writers, and experts than ever before.
For me, I don't listen to podcasts.
I follow a very slim group of writers.
And for me, an expert's first claim had better be that he's done well in the NFBC. If that is not first on the resume, then we don't have an expert.
Only a person who is going through the motions of acting like an expert.
I listened to a show on XM Radio the other day.
The Fella was ranting and raving about what a great pitcher Chris Sale was and that we should not be afraid to take him.
Uh Huh.
So easy to say.
Now, enter a Main Event, plop down $1700 and draft Sale....in the bottom of the first or top of the second.
I'd be willing to bet that this fellas asshole would pucker at the thought.
Yet, he advises all the Yahoo Kids who play in free leagues that Sale is gold.
Before technology, we had few experts. We read magazines that were already outdated by the time we read them.
Now, there's an expert on every corner and most are not as good as that outdated magazine.
And if they say they know their pitching, move on.
They know as much as me about pitching, which is damned little.
I try to combine 'smart' picks or what the draft allows me along with players that I will vault ahead of ADP because I believe ADP missed on these players.
This year, I believe I have my offense aligned.
Pitching?
No clue.
Podcasters, writers, so-called 'experts'...they always seem to have a plan, don't they?
The problem being that most of these fellas are slaves to recency bias and track records.
Max Scherzer is ranked very high by ADP and these experts.
What they see is a track record and a good year last year.
What I see is a great pitcher who may have seen his last fully healthy year.
There is no worse pick to make then selecting somebody like Scherzer, ignoring the signs from last year, only to fall victim to another year of ouches.
Does deGrom get Wins?
Does Cole adjust in NY?
Does Flaherty match the last half of last year or the first half?
Kershaw hurt,,,again?
Bueller pick up the slack?
Have we seen the last of dominant Chris Sale?
Ask a podcaster! They know. I sure as Hell don't.
Most years, I have a list of pitchers that will beat ADP.
I have one for this year too, but it's the smallest damned list I've ever had.
Combine this with Managers being 'happy' to get five innings from Starters and our job is all the harder.
Heck, even with Closers, we're a little screwed.
Josh Hader is the first Closer off the board. Think Hader is 'safe'? Consider this....
1. Hader was only a Closer because of injury last year.
2. The Brewers would rather use him as a 'Utility reliever'.
3. Hader could be traded to a team like the Yankees, where more than likely, he would not Close.
Don't you love pitching?
Last year, the first two Closers off the NFBC Boards were Edwin Diaz and Blake Treinen.
How'd that work out for us?
And believe me, every podcaster, every writer, and every 'expert' was telling us that Diaz and Treinen were as 'safe as it gets'.
Uh huh.
This year, not one pitcher is 'safe'.
From Gerritt Cole to Ivan Nova, no pitcher is truly 'safe'.
But those podcasters, writers, and experts think they have the answers.
Regurgitating recency bias and past history, and Voila!,,,,Their lists are finished.
Each year gets harder for us because we see less of these Starters.
A few years ago, Corey Kluber was the last Starter to average seven innings a start.
Now, Starters are having problems averaging even six innings.
Sonny Gray is a popular pick this year. He averaged 5 2/3 innings a Start last year.
Gray Started 31 Games. He threw seven innings in a game just three times. Three!
Max Fried averaged barely five innings.
That's only right.
Because the Braves babied him.
In 33 games, Fried threw 100 pitches just three times.
If wanting more pitches per game and not afraid of injury, draft a an old war horse.
Pitchers like Verlander, Scherzer, and Bumgarner have pitched long enough that they can tell the Manager they are throwing another inning.
We like innings.
It means strike out chances increase.
It means if behind, another chance for their team to score and get a Win for that pitcher.
For us, the odd number of 4 2/3 drives us crazy.
We are seeing it more and more because Starters thresholds and standards have lowered.
Managers have fresh arms and they love showing how smart they are by using them.
It could be worse this year with the 26-man roster.
And yet, these podcasters, writers, and experts know who to choose among pitchers.
And you know what's scary?
There are more podcasters, writers, and experts than ever before.
For me, I don't listen to podcasts.
I follow a very slim group of writers.
And for me, an expert's first claim had better be that he's done well in the NFBC. If that is not first on the resume, then we don't have an expert.
Only a person who is going through the motions of acting like an expert.
I listened to a show on XM Radio the other day.
The Fella was ranting and raving about what a great pitcher Chris Sale was and that we should not be afraid to take him.
Uh Huh.
So easy to say.
Now, enter a Main Event, plop down $1700 and draft Sale....in the bottom of the first or top of the second.
I'd be willing to bet that this fellas asshole would pucker at the thought.
Yet, he advises all the Yahoo Kids who play in free leagues that Sale is gold.
Before technology, we had few experts. We read magazines that were already outdated by the time we read them.
Now, there's an expert on every corner and most are not as good as that outdated magazine.
And if they say they know their pitching, move on.
They know as much as me about pitching, which is damned little.