Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Buster
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 6:00 pm

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by Buster » Wed Mar 01, 2006 8:38 pm

I am putting together a column for CREATiVESPORTS.com, and can use your assistance. I have always wondered which is more important, accurately projecting a player's statistics, or putting to use these projections. Obviously, the combination of the two is likely the key to winning the league.



My theory is that while preparation is key, most of us likely have somewhat similar projections and/or ranking for players, but the difference between winning and losing is not the actual projecting, but rather how you utilize the projections.



To that extent, I wanted to perform a test, to be published as part of my column, to see how varied the teams would be, and how varied the standings will be, given the fact that each team would be given completely accurate projections (or in this case, retroactive stats).



I am using last year's (2005 season) statistics, and asking you (if you have the desire and time), to pick one 1b, one 2b, one 3b, one SS, three OF and one Utility Player, as well as six pitchers (any combination of starters and/or relievers) from the list below.



I am using the standard NFBC 5 x 5 scoring, of course.



I will take as many teams as those wishing to spend the time in putting together a team. When the teams are submitted, I will crunch the numbers and use it for my column (which will be found found, free, at http://www.creativesports.com).



I anticipate quite a divergence with the teams. I also realize that one of the important skills involved in a draft or auction is the ability to anticipate what the other owners are and will be doing, and to react to that. Yes, I realize that this test does not take that, or a number of different things into account.



Nonethelss, if my hypothesis is correct, and if he plays, I am guessing that Shawn Childs will end up with the first place team. I am also guessing the GG will not have the time to play.



Tom and Greg, I realize that you are both swamped, but if you could find the time to submit a team, I would greatly appreciate it as well.



If you wish to submit a team (there is absolutely nothing to win), please e-mail it to me at [email protected]. I will take all teams submitted by March 9.



Here are the players and the stats

code:

FIRST BASE Team AB  R  H  HR  RBI  SB  AVG 

Todd Helton COL 509  92  163  20  79  3  .320 

Chad Tracy ARI 503  73  155  27  72  3  .308 

Lance Berkman HOU 468  76  137  24  82  4  .293 

Jay Gibbons BAL 488  72  135  26  79  0  .277 

Darin Erstad LAA 609  86  166  7  66  10  .273 

Adam Dunn CIN 543  107  134  40  101  4  .247 



SECOND BASE Team AB  R  H  HR  RBI  SB  AVG 

Chone Figgins LAA 642  113  186  8  57  62  .290 

Chase Utley PHI 543  93  158  28  105  16  .291 

Jeff Kent LAD 553  100  160  29  105  6  .289 

Brian Roberts BAL 561  92  176  18  73  27  .314 

Alfonso Soriano WAS 637  102  171  36  104  30  .268 

Tadahito Iguchi CWS 511  74  142  15  71  15  .278 



THIRD BASE Team AB  R  H  HR  RBI  SB  AVG 

Jorge Cantú TB 598  73  171  28  117  1  .286 

Troy Glaus TOR 538  78  139  37  97  4  .258 

Aramis Ramírez CHC 463  72  140  31  92  0  .302 

Bill Hall MIL 501  69  146  17  62  18  .291 

Melvin Mora BAL 593  86  168  27  88  7  .283 



SHORT STOP Team AB  R  H  HR  RBI  SB  AVG 

Derek Jeter NYY 654  122  202  19  70  14  .309 

Miguel Tejada BAL 654  89  199  26  98  5  .304 

Julio Lugo TB 616  89  182  6  57  39  .295 

Felipe López CIN 580  97  169  23  85  15  .291 

Jimmy Rollins PHI 677  115  196  12  54  41  .290 

José Reyes NYM 696  99  190  7  58  60  .273 



OUTFIELD Team AB  R  H  HR  RBI  SB  AVG 

Johnny Damon NYY 624  117  197  10  75  18  .316 

Matt Holliday COL 479  68  147  19  87  14  .307 

Brady Clark MIL 599  94  183  13  53  10  .306 

Ichiro Suzuki SEA 679  111  206  15  68  33  .303 

Ken Griffey Jr. CIN 491  85  148  35  92  0  .301 

Coco Crisp BOS 594  86  178  16  69  15  .300 

Scott Podsednik CWS 507  80  147  0  25  59  .290 

Juan Pierre CHC 656  96  181  2  47  57  .276 

Vernon Wells TOR 620  78  167  28  97  8  .269 

Carlos Lee MIL 618  85  164  32  114  13  .265 

Andruw Jones ATL 586  95  154  51  128  5  .263 

Cliff Floyd NYM 550  85  150  34  98  12  .273 

Jim Edmonds STL 467  88  123  29  89  5  .263 

Hideki Matsui NYY 629  108  192  23  116  2  .305 

Willy Taveras HOU 592  82  172  3  29  34  .291 



UTILITY Players Team AB  R  H  HR  RBI  SB  AVG 

Alex Rodriguez NYY 605  124  194  48  130  21  .321 

David Ortiz BOS 601  119  180  47  148  1  .300 

Derrek Lee CHC 594  120  199  46  107  15  .335 

Mark Teixeira TEX 644  112  194  43  144  4  .301 

Albert Pujols STL 591  129  195  41  117  16  .330 



PITCHERS Team W S IP K ERA WHIP

Bartolo Colón LAA 21  0  222.2  157  3.48  1.16 

Cliff Lee CLE 18  0  202.0  143  3.79  1.22 

Chris Capuano MIL 18  0  219.0  176  3.99  1.38 

Randy Johnson NYY 17  0  225.2  211  3.79  1.13 

Doug Davis MIL 11  0  222.2  208  3.84  1.30 

Brett Myers PHI 13  0  215.1  208  3.72  1.21 

Mark Prior CHC 11  0  166.2  188  3.67  1.21 

Roy Halladay TOR 12  0  141.2  108  2.41  0.96 

Rich Harden OAK 10  0  128.0  121  2.53  1.06 

Kevin Millwood TEX 9  0  192.0  146  2.86  1.22 

Carlos Silva MIN 9  0  188.1  71  3.44  1.17 

Jon Lieber PHI 17  0  218.1  149  4.20  1.21 

Tim Wakefield BOS 16  0  225.1  151  4.15  1.23 

Jeff Suppan STL 16  0  194.1  114  3.57  1.38 

José Contreras CWS 15  0  204.2  154  3.61  1.23 

C.C. Sabathia CLE 15  0  196.2  161  4.03  1.26 

Jeff Weaver LAA 14  0  224.0  157  4.22  1.17 

Bob Wickman CLE 0  45  62.0  41  2.47  1.26 

Danys Baez LAD 5  41  72.1  51  2.86  1.33 

Trevor Hoffman SD 1  43  57.2  54  2.97  1.11 

Dust Hermanson CWS 2  34  57.1  33  2.04  1.10 

B.J. Ryan TOR 1  36  70.1  100  2.43  1.14 

Huston Street OAK 5  23  78.1  72  1.72  1.01 

Scot Shields LAA 10  7  91.2  98  2.75  1.12 

Jesse Crain MIN 12  1  79.2  25  2.71  1.13 

[/QUOTE]Thanks in advance for your assistance.



Buster

Buster
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 6:00 pm

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by Buster » Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:08 am

Four responses (teams) already. You guys rock!! Keep those teams coming. Thanks again.



Buster

Gordon Gekko
Posts: 4317
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:00 pm
Contact:

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by Gordon Gekko » Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:57 am

this exercise doesn't prove a thing. waste of time

User avatar
devilznj
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:00 pm
Contact:

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by devilznj » Thu Mar 02, 2006 5:08 am

until opening day, everything is a waste of time.



just comes down to personal preference on how you want to waste your time.
Happy Recap

Gordon Gekko
Posts: 4317
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:00 pm
Contact:

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by Gordon Gekko » Thu Mar 02, 2006 5:12 am

Originally posted by devilznj:

until opening day, everything is a waste of time.

don't agree with that. sorry

Terry H
Posts: 118
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:00 pm

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by Terry H » Thu Mar 02, 2006 7:29 am

Originally posted by devilznj:

until opening day, everything is a waste of time.



just comes down to personal preference on how you want to waste your time. Some people would rather waste their time as message board motor mouths! :rolleyes:

Gordon Gekko
Posts: 4317
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:00 pm
Contact:

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by Gordon Gekko » Thu Mar 02, 2006 7:47 am

Originally posted by Terry Haney:

quote:Originally posted by devilznj:

until opening day, everything is a waste of time.



just comes down to personal preference on how you want to waste your time. Some people would rather waste their time as message board motor mouths! :rolleyes:
[/QUOTE]no wasting in that. everything i do has a purpose.



now if you want to talk about waste - is your signature true? 2005 LV NL Auction- Last Place

Buster
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 6:00 pm

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by Buster » Thu Mar 02, 2006 8:11 am

Gekko:



I am surprised, and not surprised.



I am surprised that you cannot find the value in this exercise. I won't bother to explain it to you, as it is clear that you don't care.



I am not surprised that you are not participating, though. With your self-serving, self-effectuated image, there is nothing for you to gain in this exercise. If you didn't win, you would have to deal with the fact that you were not the best. It is, quite clearly, easier for you to sit back and claim to be the best, smartest, etc., and then when you fail to win, blame injuries, bad luck, etc.



Here, there would be no injuries, no bad luck, and no surprises. The stats are all there. All you need to do is put them together in the most effective way to beat the other players. Granted, it is blind, so you don't know what the other owners are doing. Kind of like your BBDS, or the NFBC's FAAB.



Participate if you like, but I'm willing to bet that you won't win. We have far too many bright owners and if past history is any indication, you just don't have it in baseball.



Go ahead and ridicule me, the idea, and/or the column. Just be warned that a one-legged man has a better chance in a butt kicking contest, than you do of beating me in a war of words.



Buster

Terry H
Posts: 118
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:00 pm

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by Terry H » Thu Mar 02, 2006 8:54 am

Originally posted by Gordon Gekko:

quote:Originally posted by Terry Haney:

quote:Originally posted by devilznj:

until opening day, everything is a waste of time.



just comes down to personal preference on how you want to waste your time. Some people would rather waste their time as message board motor mouths! :rolleyes:
[/QUOTE]no wasting in that. everything i do has a purpose.





now if you want to talk about waste - is your signature true? 2005 LV NL Auction- Last Place
[/QUOTE]Gee does the shoe fit? I wasn't necessarily referring to you.



Sadly, signature is true. Unlike yourself I'm not the boastful type.

As for it being a waste? The enjoyment of the competition, the camaraderie with league mates, the lessons learned from a disappointing season, all in all made for a pleasurable experience, surpassing the expense, so not really a waste.

User avatar
KJ Duke
Posts: 6574
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 6:00 pm

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by KJ Duke » Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:39 am

Originally posted by Terry Haney:



Sadly, signature is true. Unlike yourself I'm not the boastful type.

As for it being a waste? The enjoyment of the competition, the camaraderie with league mates, the lessons learned from a disappointing season, all in all made for a pleasurable experience, surpassing the expense, so not really a waste. Good answer, also note that Terry won that same lge in 2004, so he remains in the black financially as well.

Gordon Gekko
Posts: 4317
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:00 pm
Contact:

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by Gordon Gekko » Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:41 am

Originally posted by Buster:

Gekko:



I am surprised, and not surprised.



I am surprised that you cannot find the value in this exercise. I won't bother to explain it to you, as it is clear that you don't care.



I am not surprised that you are not participating, though. With your self-serving, self-effectuated image, there is nothing for you to gain in this exercise. If you didn't win, you would have to deal with the fact that you were not the best. It is, quite clearly, easier for you to sit back and claim to be the best, smartest, etc., and then when you fail to win, blame injuries, bad luck, etc.



Here, there would be no injuries, no bad luck, and no surprises. The stats are all there. All you need to do is put them together in the most effective way to beat the other players. Granted, it is blind, so you don't know what the other owners are doing. Kind of like your BBDS, or the NFBC's FAAB.



Participate if you like, but I'm willing to bet that you won't win. We have far too many bright owners and if past history is any indication, you just don't have it in baseball.



Go ahead and ridicule me, the idea, and/or the column. Just be warned that a one-legged man has a better chance in a butt kicking contest, than you do of beating me in a war of words.



Buster your exercise has ZERO value. i won't bother to explain it to you, as it is clear that you don't see it that way. of course i wouldn't win...cause i wouldn't play.



my past history...well i beat some very notable folks last year, even with thome and foulke being negative values.



as far as me blaming injuries, what the heck else am i going to blame last year when rocks like thome and foulke were hurt and performed like chit?



you beat me in a war of words? go ahead and try. :D

Gordon Gekko
Posts: 4317
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:00 pm
Contact:

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by Gordon Gekko » Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:46 am

Originally posted by Terry Haney:

Gee does the shoe fit? I wasn't necessarily referring to you.

lol! sorry terry, i think everyone is out to get me :D

User avatar
KJ Duke
Posts: 6574
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 6:00 pm

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by KJ Duke » Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:46 am

Buster, I will submit a team with a request, I would like to see your column.



The last time I participated for a creative column, the expert/nfbc mock draft a few weeks ago, I didnt see or hear one thing about it from them afterword. A bit disappointing that I would spend 3 hours of my time partcipating and they don't even have the courtesy of forwarding me the article.

Buster
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 6:00 pm

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by Buster » Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:59 am

KJ Duke:



No problem. I am not certain as to what event you were involved previously, but my columns do come out weekly (or some might say weakly). I have not started baseball yet, and this will be my first baseball column of the season. I am anticipating a publish date around March 15, but much depends on the other content on CREATiVESPORTS.com.



For all that are participating, I will also forward the raw data, each teams' picks, and the standings, all prior to the column posting. If you prefer to use a pseudonym, please let me know.



As an added bonus, I will buy a steak dinner (either the night before the NFBC draft, or the night of the NFBC draft) for the person who submits the winning team, in LAS VEGAS. If the winning team doesn't come from a Vegas participant, I will buy dinner for the highest ranked team that does participate in the NFBC draft in Vegas.



Best of luck, and please keep those entries coming in. I am amazed at the response, thanks again.



Buster

User avatar
KJ Duke
Posts: 6574
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 6:00 pm

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by KJ Duke » Thu Mar 02, 2006 10:08 am

Originally posted by Buster:

KJ Duke:



No problem. I am not certain as to what event you were involved previously, but my columns do come out weekly (or some might say weakly). I have not started baseball yet, and this will be my first baseball column of the season. I am anticipating a publish date around March 15, but much depends on the other content on CREATiVESPORTS.com.



For all that are participating, I will also forward the raw data, each teams' picks, and the standings, all prior to the column posting. If you prefer to use a pseudonym, please let me know.



As an added bonus, I will buy a steak dinner (either the night before the NFBC draft, or the night of the NFBC draft) for the person who submits the winning team, in LAS VEGAS. If the winning team doesn't come from a Vegas participant, I will buy dinner for the highest ranked team that does participate in the NFBC draft in Vegas.



Best of luck, and please keep those entries coming in. I am amazed at the response, thanks again.



Buster Thanks Buster, I will submit the winning team shortly.



As for the mock I was in, I went to the creative site to see if they had written on it. They were using it as an incentive to get people to sign up to the NFBC through them, and said it was otherwise not available. I'd still like to see it ([email protected]) if available, but I appreciate your courtesy in filling us in on your new column.

Terry H
Posts: 118
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:00 pm

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by Terry H » Thu Mar 02, 2006 10:11 am

Originally posted by Buster:



As an added bonus, I will buy a steak dinner (either the night before the NFBC draft, or the night of the NFBC draft) for the person who submits the winning team, in LAS VEGAS.



Buster [/QB]So there is a prize. :cool: I'll forward my team. Will I be able to pick the restaurant?

Buster
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 6:00 pm

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by Buster » Thu Mar 02, 2006 10:49 am

Terry:



Buy you another dinner???



I was thinking of the All American Grill at the Rio. Nice steaks, good atmosphere, off the strip.



If you have other ideas, let me know.



Buster

JohnZ
Posts: 1661
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 pm

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by JohnZ » Thu Mar 02, 2006 10:50 am

Originally posted by Buster:

Terry:



Buy you another dinner???



I was thinking of the All American Grill at the Rio. Nice steaks, good atmosphere, off the strip.



If you have other ideas, let me know.



Buster Antonio's at the Rio.

Buster
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 6:00 pm

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by Buster » Thu Mar 02, 2006 11:04 am

Thanks Buster, I will submit the winning team shortly.



As for the mock I was in, I went to the creative site to see if they had written on it. They were using it as an incentive to get people to sign up to the NFBC through them, and said it was otherwise not available. I'd still like to see it ([email protected]) if available, but I appreciate your courtesy in filling us in on your new column. I will try to find out the status of the draft column, and will let you know.



Buster

User avatar
KJ Duke
Posts: 6574
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 6:00 pm

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by KJ Duke » Thu Mar 02, 2006 11:14 am

Terry and John,



Don't worry about the restaurant unless you'd like to join Buster and I while you pay your own way. :D

bowlingfool
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 6:00 pm

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by bowlingfool » Thu Mar 02, 2006 11:37 am

Originally posted by Gordon Gekko:

lol! sorry terry, i think everyone is out to get me :D GG, just 'cuz you THINK everyone is out to get you, doesn't mean they AREN'T out to get you. They might actually be out there, waiting..... ;)

Brian Walton
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 6:00 pm

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by Brian Walton » Thu Mar 02, 2006 12:53 pm

Hello, all.



I helped organize the mock draft to which KJ Duke refers and need to clear up a couple of things. First of all, to the best of my knowledge, no one said the mock was being done for a column. As noted above, it has been provided as a benefit to new NFBC signups via CREATiVESPORTS.



Regarding not getting feedback about the mock, I sent the following note and spreadsheet of the mock on February 16 to KJ Duke at the same email address listed above, as well as to Buster and the other 12 mock participants. Apparently, this was either ignored or forgotten, as none of the 14 emails bounced.



"On behalf of Lawr Michaels and all of us at CREATiVESPORTS, I want to thank you for participating in our mock draft held Monday night. You are a very efficient and interesting crew!



Special thanks to Greg and Tom for organizing the group and to Jason and Geoff for facilitation and the use of their fine facility.



Please find a copy of the draft spreadsheet results attached.



Best of luck to all in the 2006 NFBC (unless we're in the same league, in which case, the gloves come off!).



Brian Walton"



KJ Duke, I resent that same email and spreadsheet to you again just now. Thank you for participating, despite the complaints!



Brian



[ March 02, 2006, 07:04 PM: Message edited by: brian ]
Brian Walton
creativesports.com

Gordon Gekko
Posts: 4317
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:00 pm
Contact:

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by Gordon Gekko » Thu Mar 02, 2006 12:59 pm

Originally posted by bowlingfool:

quote:Originally posted by Gordon Gekko:

lol! sorry terry, i think everyone is out to get me :D GG, just 'cuz you THINK everyone is out to get you, doesn't mean they AREN'T out to get you. They might actually be out there, waiting..... ;) [/QUOTE]hopefully the people waiting for me are strippers :D

User avatar
KJ Duke
Posts: 6574
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 6:00 pm

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by KJ Duke » Thu Mar 02, 2006 1:04 pm

Originally posted by brian:

Hello, all.



I helped organize the mock draft to which KJ Duke refers and need to clear up a couple of things. First of all, no one said the mock was being done for a column. As noted above, it has been provided as a benefit to new NFBC signups via CREATiVESPORTS.



Regarding not getting feedback about the mock, I sent the following note and spreadsheet of the mock on February 16 to KJ Duke at the same email address listed above, as well as to Buster and the other 12 mock participants. Apparently, this was either ignored or forgotten, as none of the 14 emails bounced.



"On behalf of Lawr Michaels and all of us at CREATiVESPORTS, I want to thank you for participating in our mock draft held Monday night. You are a very efficient and interesting crew!



Special thanks to Greg and Tom for organizing the group and to Jason and Geoff for facilitation and the use of their fine facility.



Please find a copy of the draft spreadsheet results attached.



Best of luck to all in the 2006 NFBC (unless we're in the same league, in which case, the gloves come off!).



Brian Walton"



KJ Duke, I resent that same email and spreadsheet to you again just now. Thank you for participating, despite the complaints!



Brian Brian, I guess I misunderstood the purpose of the mock.



I enjoyed the draft, but I was looking forward to creative's analysis of it. If nothing was written, I have no complaint. Sorry.



And Brian, I do recall receiving the above email from you. I should've checked with you directly rather than making a flip comment on the MB. In the future I'll give you guys the benefit of the doubt.



[ March 03, 2006, 12:38 AM: Message edited by: KJ Duke ]

Brian Walton
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 6:00 pm

Which is more important, projections, or how you assemble your team?

Post by Brian Walton » Thu Mar 02, 2006 2:03 pm

No problem. Now that Buster has reminded me that I have to start getting "creative" soon, maybe I can cook up a column based on that mock, after all...



Brian
Brian Walton
creativesports.com

Post Reply