KJ Duke wrote:Outlaw wrote:Greg Ambrosius wrote:but let's not call someone who disagrees with that strategy names. Everyone has a right to their opinion and now KJ gets to prove if his strategy worked or not.
Couldnt agree more with name calling and that everyone has thier own individual opinion... it's called respect, something that seems to be a lost value these days in our country.
I agree, but call me BUSH - twice - and I'm gonna tell you what I really think. I let is slide the first time.
I'll try to be nicer from here on to the guy that's paying for my team next season.
In many formats, there are "undroppable" players, or players that you are not allowed to drop, due to the integrity of the league. The NFBC has never chosen to take this route, and I agree. If you want to designate 30 or 40 players and say they are undroppable, unless they are injured, you could just as well say there are 70-80 players based upon possible future performance or past results... its a no win situation. Greg made the determination that there was no collusion and the strategy was to help his own team, not to give up on his team or throw in the towel. Personally, I have no problem with anyone KJ dropped. I could see how Ian Kennedy could be questioned, but if I dropped RA Dickey 6 weeks ago, no one would have said a word. Its all about timing, and it appears everyone KJ dropped, other than maybe Kennedy, looks like pretty good moves at this point... Oh and by the way, I would think calling KJ "Bush" would sorta be a backwards compliment, in a republican sorta way... and calling him "Bush" twice? Well... enough said.