In thinking about this league and how I should set my KDS, I jumped to the conclusion that the Rockies hitters and the National pitchers were the top two choices. I really thought they separated from all of the other choices.
I think the advantage of playing half of your games in Coors Field is huge for hitters. I took a quick look at last year's stats in preparation for this league. The Rockies hit 186 homers last year with Tulo missing half of the year and very little contribution from Cargo. The next highest NL team was the Cubs with 157 homers. The Rockies hit .276 as a team. The Dodgers were the only other team over .260 (they hit .265 and now are weaker offensively). The Rockies scored 755 runs last year. Only three other NL teams scored more than 670 runs and the Dodgers were the only other NL team over 700 runs (718). Thus, in terms of advantages over the rest of the field, I thought the Rockies hitters were the best choice. They were my #1 choice at least.
In terms of pitching, the Nats' pitchers also are in a class by themselves. Hell, if you go 7 starters/2 relievers, you got 5/7 of your starters with Scherzer, Strasburg, Zimmermann, Fister and Gonzalez. With Storen, you now have 6/9 of your starting pitching staff and should be able to find two decent starters and the closer from any AL team and have a great staff. Also, by picking the Nats' pitchers early, you eliminated any chance of getting stuck with the Rockies or Diamondbacks pitchers, which I viewed as two of the three worst outcomes (the other being the Braves hitters).
Thus, in setting my KDS, I went 1, 2, and then started aiming toward the backend of the snake, to get a higher pick in Rounds 2-4. I got 13 (and then 3, 3, 3 in Rounds 2-4). When the Rockies' bats fell to Eric at 1.6, I was kicking myself big time for a shitty KDS.
Once I got to pick, I was pretty happy to get the Brewers' hitters in Round 1. I had them as the third best NL bats behind the Rockies and the Pirates. I also was happy with the Indians' pitchers in Round 2. Having gotten a strong NL hitting team, I decided to go pitching in Rounds 2 and 3 to try to get a decent staff, with the hope and expectation that there would be a decent AL hitting team left for me at 4.3. I liked the Mariners (who were taken) as the best AL pitchers, and after that I had the Indians, Rays and Angels grouped together. I was a little worried about the Rays winning games, although I think they have some upside starters and liked the idea of having McGee and Boxberger as relievers for most of the season. Ultimately, I went with the clear ace in Kluber, high upside arms in Carrasco and Salazar, and a solid closer in Allen. In Round 3, I went NL pitching. I did not want to leave NL pitching until Round 4 because I was afraid there might be a run on NL pitching in an effort to avoid getting stuck with the Rockies and D'Backs (or even the Phillies, who do have Hamels, Lee, Papelbon and Giles, but could lose Hamels and/or Papelbon at any point during the preseason or season). I was fairly happy with the SF Giants pitchers given what was left. While MadBum is the only sure thing in the starting rotation, there is talent among Cain, Peavy, Petit, Hudson, Lincecum, etc., and hopefully one or two will be a consistent, strong SP. I also think Bruce B. does a great job managing his pitchers, the home field is very favorable, and Casilla or Romo should be OK as my second closer.
Thus, after three rounds I really liked my team. Then you guys went ahead and screwed-up all my plans by taking any decent AL hitting team before my pick at 4.3. I thought maybe the Royals or Twins bats would fall to me and, while neither is a great hitting team, they have a few useful pieces that would have gone well with the Brewers bats. But, nooooooo. With 13 picks left in the draft, the only AL teams left for hitting were the A's and the Rays, my two lowest-rated AL hitting teams. I went with the A's but am concerned about the lack of power on that team. Thought about the Rays to get Longoria, but a healthy Reddick and Crisp (no sure thing there!) would fill out my OF nicely, and I think the A's have some useful MI options (Zobrist, Lawrie, Semien) that also give me a lot of positional flexibility.
Anyway, I'm moderately comfortable - but not thrilled - with my team. It would be interesting to hear how others in this league saw things and what their strategies were going into the draft. Given the unique strategy, and the fact that this should be a very easy league to manage during the year, I would do this one again.
Also, it will be fun for a change to win every FAAB bid I make for only $1.
Mike