Just wanted to drop a note and say just because I do not post on these boards anymore. Does not mean I still have not seen one post by John Zaleski that I agree with. Good points plymouth and all of them need to be considered long and hard by Greg. I trust he will. Now back to my undisclosed, secret location. Signed,
President of the Underground Network.



Since day one, I find it very humorous that so many think this kind of info is so valuable when the results prove it irrelevant, that I joke about it.
PROVE me wrong is all I ask. Try that instead of a blanket statement against me. Discuss why I am wrong.
Let's see, I saw two different types of instances here this year. Both, I truly don't care about and truly find it interesting that this info is so important to them. One is in 5th place, one is in 14th place. How does it help them?
Yes, you know who they like. Guess what, there are at least 10 other owners that like them as much and want them just as bad, making each draft so different, that this is just a waste of time IMO.
It's also a false assumption that when you look at who Jupinka took Round 2, that that's the #1 guy he wanted there. It could easily have been his 3rd choice Rd 2. So now you armed with faulty data. How does this help YOUR team win?
I'm honored it happened to me this year. But I'm not sure why it happened since I'm #250 on the list, as so clearly pointed out so many times before.
P.S. Sorry I missed lunch and thanks for the invite. I was talking to Jules at the time, and consider her a very good friend, and wasn't ready to end that conversation.
[ July 17, 2008, 01:16 PM: Message edited by: UFS ]