Last year, a very well known fantasy player accidentally dropped Aaron Rodgers while playing in another very large, very prominent national football contest.
Around the same time of that drop, someone else accidentally dropped Chris Johnson in the NFFC.
As the top QB & RB in fantasy football last year, it was obvious to anyone who knows the sport that neither drop should have or was meant to be made.
The other contest followed their precedent and did not return Rodgers to the team that cut him.
The NFFC followed their precedent and returned Chris Johnson when notified of the mistake.
Both contests did what they have always done.
Three questions....
-Which was the fairer decision to the teams that made these honest mistakes?
-Which was the decision that most protected the integrity of the respective leagues and least skewed the final results & standings?
-Which decision made sure what was meant to be done & what was supposed to be done, actually was done?
To me, the answers are obvious. I don't blame the other contest for following their precedent. I just prefer the way situations like this are handled here and the personal service that is provided in making sure the decisions made are the right ones. Even when I disagree with a decision (the original Sizemore ruling comes to mind), I appreciate the time and thought process both Vince McMahon, oops I mean Greg

They handled it the way I hope I would have if it were up to me.
Glenn
[ June 09, 2010, 09:08 AM: Message edited by: Glenneration X ]