Double Play overall standings

whipsaw · Post by **whipsaw** » Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:34 am

Perhaps as a result of combining the live and online portions, the overall standings do not appear to be ranking folks appropriately in the ratio categories. If you scroll down in ERA, for example, you see people with 3.xx ERAs ranked in that category below people with 4.xx ERAs. I'm just wondering what's going on there, perhaps the results screen is just pulling the ERA data incorrectly.

Greg Ambrosius · Post by **Greg Ambrosius** » Tue Apr 05, 2011 3:38 am

Originally posted by whipsaw:

Perhaps as a result of combining the live and online portions, the overall standings do not appear to be ranking folks appropriately in the ratio categories. If you scroll down in ERA, for example, you see people with 3.xx ERAs ranked in that category below people with 4.xx ERAs. I'm just wondering what's going on there, perhaps the results screen is just pulling the ERA data incorrectly. We'll get this corrected.