Just Thoughts!

billywaz
Posts: 658
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 6:00 pm
Contact:

Just Thoughts!

Post by billywaz » Sun Jun 14, 2009 11:58 pm

Originally posted by sportsbettingman:

What a difference a decision makes.



My two spots in the Main draft where I actually had two players and was flip-flopping back and forth between who to draft while on the clock...and whiffed at both in retrospect.



Pujols or Reyes?



Took Reyes.



Billingsly or Liriano.



Took Liriano.



Win some and lose some.



...at least the beneficiary of my poor coin flips is a great guy! (Mr. Enzyte) :D Lance,



That isn't "win some and lose some".



That is "blow out and blow out"



Who am I to talk, I took Milledge! :eek:

User avatar
Edwards Kings
Posts: 5909
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Duluth, Georgia

Just Thoughts!

Post by Edwards Kings » Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:04 am

Week 10 Results – Holy crap! Not a good week for hitters. The good news is Jimmy Rollins led my team in HR. The bad news is that was only two and he was the only one to be so prolific. BJ Upon reached base only seven times last week, but ended up with seven steals. There is a silver lining for you. Beltre, Felipe Lopez, Hawpe and Konerko were the only guys on my team to hit better than .286. Nine guys hit less than .250 with six of them hitting .200 or less. I knew I was accepting some BA risk but this is ridiculous. My team had only seven total HR to go with 35/32 Runs and RBI’s and the 0.236 team BA. I am not making up ground, merely falling farther behind.



On pitching, I had nine games started, but only one win and NO SAVES. Lidge going down did not help, but Madson had two saves before I could get him in, but none over the weekend. The Braves, not Gonzalez, are the problem. He just is not getting changes and if there are tough left-handers due up in the eight, Gonzalez gets the call and Soriano gets the save. I did hit my K target, but little else. Wandy (from the bench, and I am such an Einstien), Vazquez and Danks pitched well. Brett Anderson, Bonderman, Aroyo, and Davis, not so much. Andy Sonnanstine was up and down, but my biggest concern has been the number of baserunners he has been allowing. The good news there is that over the last three starts, his WHIP has been a smooth 1.000. Since his K rate is so low (less than one K per two IP over those same starts) this year, he has to be pinpoint to be successful. The low K rate has long-term concerns (he is too young to have such a drop off, so there is an injury masked there) because this continues a trend from the second half of last year, but maybe he can hold out until I get healthy elsewhere.



Week 11 Planning – Holy crap! Not a good week for pitching and I dropped Bonderman. I know he has never seemed to put it together longer than a few games in the past, but he is still on my radar. Skills first and he seems to have the underlying set. It will come together for him, just predicting when is the problem.



There was not much pitching out there this week. The big money getter this week was Bergesen. Listen, I am sucking hind-tit in most categories so pay no attention to me, but I just do not want an Orioles pitcher with a low K rate. Just not my cup of tea. And Contreras, though he was my second “choice”, has had a few good games, but everyone raise there hands if they have been seriously burned by this guy once during their fantasy careers. Others must have had the same thought in my league as no one else put a prime bid for him. I got Micah Owings only because he has the Braves and CHW next. However, both his and Aroyo’s starts are at home, so I may go with three relievers again (Madson, Gonzalez, and Soriano). In short, Owings is at least breathing in the Majors, so he is of more use to me than Bonderman. Using six starters would put me at nine starts for the week, which is a little light. Game time decision, but if I go with another starter, I am leaning towards Micah. The six that are for sure are Vazquez, Wandy, Danks, Sonnanstine, Davis, and Anderson.



From the bench, Beckham started getting acclimated to the bigs with four hits over his last couple of games and Rasmus fooled me with 21 AB for the week. I am still not going to start Becham yet, but Rasmus is in, especially since Headley plays all his games at home this week. With a bench of only three offensive players, and Encarnacion still on the DL, that is about all the decisions I have to make, offensive and offensively as they may be.



I have money, but the FA pool is picked relatively clean. Certainly I have no one better on my radar than what I already have. In those easy, lazy, hazy days of 2004, I picked up David Wright from the FA pool. This is a change in the NFBC. In MOST leagues, the premier impact studs are usually drafted and held, like Hanson. Or maybe the Majors are just bringing the studs out of Spring Training more. I am not sure, but I just do not see another impact player like that coming up out there this year. Yes, there are other guys, but they all seem to have bigger “ifs” than the likes of Wright, Braun, Wieters, and Hanson. “If he learns to steal first base”, “If he learns a third pitch”, “If he learns the dimensions of home plate”, “If he cuts down on his strikouts”, “If he cuts down on the cannoli”. I am still looking, but I think the guys I have are generally better than what is out there.



I am really going to be a second half team (too many guys underperforming not to). While I may have dug too much of a hole to contend, I fully intend to try and put a scare into as many people as possible. After Week 13, I want to look at my draft, my projections, and my results to date. Might be “fun”.
Baseball is a slow, boring, complex, cerebral game that doesn't lend itself to histrionics. You 'take in' a baseball game, something odd to say about a football or basketball game, with the clock running and the bodies flying.
Charles Krauthammer

User avatar
Edwards Kings
Posts: 5909
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Duluth, Georgia

Just Thoughts!

Post by Edwards Kings » Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:47 am

Week 11 Results – The inter-league play schedule really hit me in AB, but strangely enough, for the first time all year I exceeded all my hitting targets. Small wonders never cease. Brandon Phillips pretty much ran wild a couple of games and gave me four SB. Hafner only had 10 AB, but hit two homeruns, as did Pence. UPTON IS ALIVE! He hit 0.429 with two homeruns and two SB. Is he turning the corner? Despite my 0.307 Team BA for the week, I still had six guys hit under 0.250 including a couple under the Mendoza line. Upton, Pence, Phillips, Duncan, Rasmus, Hafner, and Brian Anderson (yes, that Brian Anderson) all hit 0.350 or better. I also ended up with team totals for the week of 12 HR (no one with more than two with nine contributing and three on the bench), 8 SB, 46 R and 43 RBI. I need several more like this and better if I am going to make up enough ground to be mediocre. This brought my BA up four points and otherwise stopped the bleeding. A good week with the 32nd best Offensive results for Week 11 (I know, a small shallow victory), but pales to the week Kevin Schiller had for our league and overall. Congrats Kevin! Chicks really do dig the long ball!



Pitching was “OK” overall, but glaring weaknesses remain. Ryan Madson was given the ball and choked. I mean choked bad. He was lit up like a gas can and took two losses. The Braves afforded no save opportunities for Gonzalez or Soriano. In short, three short relievers, not saves this week…again. That is a serious hole for me and none of the part-timers who are getting the jobs these days (Frasor, Accardo, MacDougal) will plug it, so I have not bid on them. Overall, my starters except Sonnanstine pitched well but in bad luck. Even from the bench, Owings and Arroyo pitched well. For the week, they had K’s in nearly 89% of IP, and even with Davis’ and Wandy’s wildness, had K/BB ratio of better than 2:1, so the WHIP for starters was a decent 1.268. ERA was a little high, but my main problem is the teams they pitch for are having difficulty winning as out of eight starts, I only got two wins. I continue to rack up K’s, but that is about all for the counting stats, and the ERA and WHIP categories continue to be burned by a rotation of players blowing up.



Week 12 Planning – Actually, the only bad news hitting wise last week was that Encarnacion is one set-back from calling it a year. I had such high hopes for him. Even if he does come back, it would not surprise me if the Reds cut bait on him. His defense is too bad and he has just been too inconsistent otherwise. I cannot bring myself to cut him (yet) but I need that roster spot. If someone pops up that is worth the risk (and I haven’t really seen them yet), I may have to drop Encarnacion. It looks like only one team in the Main/Ultra/Super leagues has done that so far.



I am getting some players back, however. With Madson’s troubles, I expect Lidge back Wednesday. I am going to put him and Gonzalez in, for sure. Kazmir has a AAA start this week and I should know if he will be back Week 13, or will he need more time. I could use his front-line persona bad. As soon as he is back, I will put him in. I am too deeply behind not to gamble on the “good” Kaz showing up. But for this week, I have a ton of decisions to make. Three relievers or two? Are the Cincy pitchers on the road at CLE and TOR too risky? Doug Davis is wilder and wilder…time to cut bait (a couple of teams already have)?



I tried to pick up one pitcher that no body else seems to have too much love for, but foolishly underbid…thank you KJ Duke ;) ! As it is, there are no changes in the make-up of my team. So, I am going definitely with my “best” starters in Vazquez, Wandy, Danks and Sonnanstine. Brett Anderson should get Colorado in Oakland, so that looks like a good match-up. That leaves Arroyo (one at TOR), Owings (two at TOR and CLE) and Davis at home versus LAA. Not very palatable. I have that consistent feeling that whomever I leave on the bench will pitch well and whoever I start will have a meltdown, but ain’t that always the case. I need to grow a pair and stick with someone and I think those someones will be Davis and Arroyo.



On offense, with Headley (by the way, he only had two hits last week, so that made my decision to sit him ok, but those two hits were HOMERUNS…man, I hope they trade this kid to a better ballpark) away from PETCO all week, including three in Texas, he becomes a viable option as Blanks will probably DH. Rasmus is hitting well, though still not showing much power or speed. Duncan had a good week and when he gets hot it is nice. Plus St. Louis is playing seven games this week including four against the Mets including the three righthanders at the back of their rotation. It really looks like the odd men out are Anderson (nice week, but to use him too much is pressing what little luck I have) and Pronk. Hafner will be pitch hitting the first three games of the week as the Indians will be in Pittsburgh. The Reds come to Cleveland and they will face two righthanders and some warm body for Volquez, so I could live with the 10-12 AB since he is so productive, but in the long run I generally lean towards the guys who get the most AB’s. This leaves Beckham who played very well last (0.375 BA with four runs and four RBIS to go with his homerun). I am leaning towards Beckham over Hafner this week. Next week Headley is back in PETCO all week, and Hafner will be back in the AL, so the decision will probably be a little easier.



Kind of quiet last week...discussion/comments welcome!



[ June 22, 2009, 10:10 AM: Message edited by: Edwards Kings ]
Baseball is a slow, boring, complex, cerebral game that doesn't lend itself to histrionics. You 'take in' a baseball game, something odd to say about a football or basketball game, with the clock running and the bodies flying.
Charles Krauthammer

Sebadiah23
Posts: 702
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 6:00 pm
Contact:

Just Thoughts!

Post by Sebadiah23 » Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:23 pm

Hey. I reluctantly started Headley also- he's so frustrating to watch. His demeanor is strange, its like he's a surfer dude with a whatever attitude. Thats the vibe I get. I hope I'm misreading him.



Anyway, I was tempted to go with Daniel Murphy against 6 righties (7 games total), but he is a speed/power vacuum right now so Headley it is (and Blanks!)



Go Padres
We drove 22 miles, country around Farmington. Signs started appearing. THE MOST PHOTOGRAPHED BARN IN AMERICA. Cars,tour bus,cameras;postcards sold.

No one sees the barn,

They are taking pictures of taking pictures
-Don DeLillo
@Sebadiah23, IG:sebadiah26

sportsbettingman
Posts: 3038
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:00 pm
Contact:

Just Thoughts!

Post by sportsbettingman » Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:21 pm

Pulling Uehara after a mere 76 pitches... :rolleyes:



You get what you ask for!



How many time can he have under 100 pitches and get pulled, and that garbage bullpen blows it?



Thanks for keeping your thread here going, Wayne's World...and WELCOME BACK DOUGHBOYS!!!
"The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once."

~Albert Einstein

User avatar
Edwards Kings
Posts: 5909
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Duluth, Georgia

Just Thoughts!

Post by Edwards Kings » Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:55 am

Interesting thoughts about some trends I am seeing early this week...



I think it will become rarer and rarer that Rasmus and Duncan are in the line-up at the same time. It is going to take another injury for me to get full-time AB out of both, but Duncan is looking like the loser here. If St. Louis goes out to get another bat, both could be losers.



For the second night, Gonzalez has pitched the 8th and Soriano the 9th. Cox had said he would pitch Gonzalez if a tough LH batter was due up in the eighth, but that does not hold water here as pretty much of the next seven guys up (six guys in the game and the most obvious bat off the bench to hit for the pitcher, Damon) were either LHers (3) or SHers (3), the exception being Jeter. I guess Cox could have been thinking it was worth it for Gonzo to take on Cano and, assuming all went well, have Soriano pitch to Jeter, but I think I should focus on Soriano as the primary closer more than Gonzalez going forward.



Of all my choices to play (Hafner, Rasmus, Duncan, Brian Anderson, and Beckham), Hafner would so far have been the biggest help this week because he hasn't played. All the rest are 0-3 with no counting stats.



Made the right call so far on Owings. There were several bids on him so people could take advantage of two starts away from Great American and just over half started him. He could still have a good game at Cleveland, but last night he was very hittable. Arroyo-yoyo starts tonight. He is active in two thirds of the leagues. Let's all get together and say a little word to hope he does not blow up too.
Baseball is a slow, boring, complex, cerebral game that doesn't lend itself to histrionics. You 'take in' a baseball game, something odd to say about a football or basketball game, with the clock running and the bodies flying.
Charles Krauthammer

DOUGHBOYS
Posts: 13091
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 6:00 pm

Just Thoughts!

Post by DOUGHBOYS » Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:44 am

Good to see the thread still going, Wayne.

Good stuff.

The trading of Headley is a pipe dream. $411,500 is a salary even they can accommodate.



Hypothetical question for Wayne (the Braves fan) and everybody else-



The 104 steroid positive names are released. Only one of these names are on the list, which name would hurt baseball the most?



A. Chipper Jones

B. Ken Griffey Jr

C. Albert Pujols

D. Derek Jeter



This was my hypothetical at the softball park last night. Almost all the "common folk" answered with Derek Jeter.

Myself, Jeter would be the most surprising having never showed extreme power fluctuations, but I'd have to imagine that Chipper's name being on that list would be like a dagger through alot of southern hearts.
On my tombstone-
Wait! I never had the perfect draft!

User avatar
Edwards Kings
Posts: 5909
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Duluth, Georgia

Just Thoughts!

Post by Edwards Kings » Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:18 am

Hmmm....as a Braves fan, yes, Chipper would hurt most. Most folks I talk too love him when he is in, but are a little tired of the two- or three-game mini-DL stints he puts himself on. I think they would turn on him pretty quickly.



As to the most damage to baseball? Pujols. Griffey, Jones, and to a certain extent Jeter are in the twilight of their respective careers. Pujols is in his prime and is arguably the most popular player in MLB today.



[ June 24, 2009, 12:19 PM: Message edited by: Edwards Kings ]
Baseball is a slow, boring, complex, cerebral game that doesn't lend itself to histrionics. You 'take in' a baseball game, something odd to say about a football or basketball game, with the clock running and the bodies flying.
Charles Krauthammer

User avatar
NorCalAtlFan
Posts: 1258
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 6:00 pm
Contact:

Just Thoughts!

Post by NorCalAtlFan » Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:20 am

As a Braves fan, that would hurt. But honestly, he was pretty jacked up around 99-00. Not McGwire huge, but jacked up. So I would be surprised if he tested positive in 2003, but would not be 100% shocked if he ever took some questionable PED's.

Griffey would be the most shocking. He's the Kid. Jeter would be polarizing, as those who hate the Yankees would hate them even more, those who like the Yankees would be like Giants fans towards Bonds. The "he's our guy, so f you" stance. Griffey would just be so disappointing to everyone.

sportsbettingman
Posts: 3038
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:00 pm
Contact:

Just Thoughts!

Post by sportsbettingman » Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:28 am

Living in the present, like MLB does...Pujols would hurt baseball the most if he's on the list.



Personally...I think Chipper and Jr. would make me feel the worst...as I liked both of their careers, and they were the face of baseball for their respective areas of the US.



I would not be surprised if Pujols was there...especially with his SB's this year!!! :eek:



The drop in SB for Jeter had me thinking it was possible, but unless he's back on something...he's "on pace" to rebound to the upper 20's again. His steady stats don't much resemble the spikes of a PED user.
"The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once."

~Albert Einstein

DOUGHBOYS
Posts: 13091
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 6:00 pm

Just Thoughts!

Post by DOUGHBOYS » Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:21 am

Its a good hypothetical becuse of the diversion of baseball fans.

Regionality would play a huge part. But also the knowledge of baseball in each person would beon display as well.

The geeks (us), who know every number and player would probably be more affected by Pujols and Griffey Jr.

The fans (ballpark fillers) may be affected most by Chipper because of TBS being coast-to-coast and numerous playoffs with the Braves.

The commoner (Joe Public) may be more affected by Jeter with his Yankee notoriety, entertainment Tonight persona and his commercials.

Backing this up, I asked my Aunt Ruth who those people are. Here are the responses:



Chipper Jones- "Chipper? I like that name, but I don't know who he is."



Ken Griffey Jr- "Oh yes, he used to play baseball!"



Albert Pujols- "I don't know who that is."



Derek Jeter- "What a nice looking young man! I saw him on tv the other day and he's single! He's a baseball player too, right?"



These answers got me thinking that although baseball would take a big hit from the baseball community if Albert or Griffey Jr were on the list, the public relations hit OUTSIDE the baseball community may be greater if Jeter were on the list. More CNN and Fox News coverage with Jeter, while the others get the ESPN and sports radio treatment.



The hypothetical for tonight is more for fun-

If you can start a new baseball league ala Vince McMahon, what changes would you make to have customers come to your games?



A couple from me-



All balls over the fence are live, making for more home field advantage. If a visiting player hits a home run, he better be running out of the box. Once the ball reaches the bleachers, the fan can, keep it, throw it back on the field himself,or hand it to the outfielder to try and nail baserunners. This puts the bleacher fan into the game.



Three balls for a walk and two strikes for an out.

We want them up there swinging.
On my tombstone-
Wait! I never had the perfect draft!

User avatar
Edwards Kings
Posts: 5909
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Duluth, Georgia

Just Thoughts!

Post by Edwards Kings » Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:39 am

Originally posted by DOUGHBOYS:

The hypothetical for tonight is more for fun- If you can start a new baseball league ala Vince McMahon, what changes would you make to have customers come to your games?Rules...schmules. Forget raking customers over consessions. A $7 beer and $5 hot dog has much more to do with me not going to the park than all the dope, dopes, steroids, strikes and overpaid pansies. $1 beer and $1 dogs...free peanuts...reasonably priced souvieners. That would bring people into my ball park. Oh, and wet t-shirt contests...women only please.
Baseball is a slow, boring, complex, cerebral game that doesn't lend itself to histrionics. You 'take in' a baseball game, something odd to say about a football or basketball game, with the clock running and the bodies flying.
Charles Krauthammer

DOUGHBOYS
Posts: 13091
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 6:00 pm

Just Thoughts!

Post by DOUGHBOYS » Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:48 am

Great thoughts, Wayne. Don't forget parking. Outrageous.



While on vacation we went to see a minor league baseball game. $13 for a ticket and all you can eat, two items at a time.

Gotta love minor league promotions.



[ June 24, 2009, 04:02 PM: Message edited by: DOUGHBOYS ]
On my tombstone-
Wait! I never had the perfect draft!

sportsbettingman
Posts: 3038
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:00 pm
Contact:

Just Thoughts!

Post by sportsbettingman » Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:04 am

LOVE the throw a live homer back onto the field of play!



The bleachers seats would sell out!



Also like the more reasonably priced food/drink and parking. Just like modern casino's...now every little niche needs to profit or die, rather than looking at it as a whole re: making a profit.



From a rules standpoint...I'd create the half win. Wins could be given out in one whole win, or two half wins. These butcher blown save win vultures would never get a full win.



I'd also give half earned runs for inheirited runners on base. Your SP gets pulled for loading the bases with two outs, and Joe Dumbass RP comes in a gives up a grand slam. Three half runs charged to the SP, and 3 halves and a whole ER charged to the RP.



~Lance
"The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once."

~Albert Einstein

DOUGHBOYS
Posts: 13091
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 6:00 pm

Just Thoughts!

Post by DOUGHBOYS » Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:06 am

Originally posted by Edwards Kings:

quote:Originally posted by DOUGHBOYS:

The hypothetical for tonight is more for fun- If you can start a new baseball league ala Vince McMahon, what changes would you make to have customers come to your games?Rules...schmules. Forget raking customers over consessions. A $7 beer and $5 hot dog has much more to do with me not going to the park than all the dope, dopes, steroids, strikes and overpaid pansies. $1 beer and $1 dogs...free peanuts...reasonably priced souvieners. That would bring people into my ball park. Oh, and wet t-shirt contests...women only please. [/QUOTE]Wet t-shirt mention...women only please mentioned.. and nothing from Q? :D
On my tombstone-
Wait! I never had the perfect draft!

DOUGHBOYS
Posts: 13091
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 6:00 pm

Just Thoughts!

Post by DOUGHBOYS » Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:09 am

Originally posted by sportsbettingman:

LOVE the throw a live homer back onto the field of play!



The bleachers seats would sell out!



Also like the more reasonably priced food/drink and parking. Just like modern casino's...now every little niche needs to profit or die, rather than looking at it as a whole re: making a profit.



From a rules standpoint...I'd create the half win. Wins could be given out in one whole win, or two half wins. These butcher blown save win vultures would never get a full win.



I'd also give half earned runs for inheirited runners on base. Your SP gets pulled for loading the bases with two outs, and Joe Dumbass RP comes in a gives up a grand slam. Three half runs charged to the SP, and 3 halves and a whole ER charged to the RP.



~Lance I like it, Lance.



By the same token, a half run scored for the guy who hit a single or walked and a half run scored for the fella that forced him out at second.
On my tombstone-
Wait! I never had the perfect draft!

sportsbettingman
Posts: 3038
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:00 pm
Contact:

Just Thoughts!

Post by sportsbettingman » Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:52 pm

Originally posted by DOUGHBOYS:

[QUOTE]By the same token, a half run scored for the guy who hit a single or walked and a half run scored for the fella that forced him out at second. I like that as well. Reward the guys who don't hit into outs, and easy to track/score as well.
"The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once."

~Albert Einstein

sportsbettingman
Posts: 3038
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:00 pm
Contact:

Just Thoughts!

Post by sportsbettingman » Thu Jun 25, 2009 1:01 pm

Yes, I am superstitious...am I not alone? :D



When watching one of my MLB pitchers, here are all the "luck changing" moves...



Full screen?



Back to smaller screen.



Focus on overall pitch.



Focus on Catcher and hs glove.



Focus on the umpire.



Focus on the batter.



Focus on the landing leg/balance of follow through.



Focus on arm during pitch.



When one is in a grove...you better believe that's all I'm watching until I need to change my luck! :D :D :D



Seem to have best luck watching landing leg/balance.



Any other quirks out there???



~Lance
"The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once."

~Albert Einstein

User avatar
Edwards Kings
Posts: 5909
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Duluth, Georgia

Just Thoughts!

Post by Edwards Kings » Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:06 am

As I get ready to do my annual Week 13 mid-year NFBC team review (known primarily around my household as the “Oh crap, what the hell happened?”), I decided to do an advance preliminary SCI Comparison. Basically, I take my team results and compare them to the SCI or “Shawn Childs Index”. I first met Shawn in 2004 when we ended up in the same inaugural NFBC league. He really pissed me off from the start by not thinking that my drafting of Chipper Jones and Jason Giambi, especially when I got them, were the steals of the draft. If you look at Chipper’s and Steroboy’s stats for 2004, you will see just how right Shawn was. Seriously, Shawn is a nice guy and I really enjoyed talking with him in Vegas this year, but he keeps hacking me off. I keep looking at his teams after the draft and say “nice, but I think mine is better this year”, but then every year Shawn is top talent, and I am assistant laundry room attendant (one day I hope to get promoted to “Towel” from “Jockstrap”). So, from time to time, I look to see just what the difference between Shawn’s team and mine is, hence the “SCI”.



I have so many grossly underperforming pitchers (Lidge, Kazmir, Sonnanstine) that I want to concentrate on hitting for this prelim, comparing my weak overall Total Batting Points of (through the games of Thursday, 6/25) 577.0 to Shawn’s much more respectable 1,183.5. Breaking down YTD stats (rather than really working) showed me once again just how tight the NFBC is, top to bottom. Overall, neither of us are exactly excited by the 0.2656 and 0.2646 team batting average (his and mine respectively). Shawn has Crawford, so his 90/76 advantage over me in SB is not surprising, but my 76 is very respectable and is not where my problem is. Shawn is outpointing me at least a weeks worth (and in some cases two) of counting stats for HR, RBI and R. But where exactly is his team better than mine?



Both of us are struggling (especially Shawn) with the catcher position, have good MI, good OF and decent (Shawn) to lagging (me) at UT. But add all those up (i.e. excluding CM), we are very close to a stats match. Shawn has a 0.2692 BA over 2,574 AB with 358 runs, 76 homeruns, 334 RBI’s and 87 SB. Mine are 0.2676, 360, 77, 322, and 66. In short, the only real difference between Shawn’s production and my production is in the corner man slots.



Shawn’s trio of Howard, Zimmerman, and Giambi are one of his BA headaches. Howard and Giambi are holding him back in that department. Likewise, Beltre and the combo of Encarnacion/Duncan/Beckham are hurting my BA. Zimmerman is producing well in that department and for me Konerko (that was a nice 13th round pick for me) is close to his form of old. I am also getting a nice pick-up from Beltre’s nine SB, while Shawn has to settle for Howard’s three. But that is where any and all favorable (for me) comparisons end. Shawn is getting much more production (R, HR, RBI) than I am. Shawn’s threesome is DKFP (Dan Kenyon Favorite -PROJECTING) out to average about 100/30/105. Very key.



I had hoped to draft some production here too, counting on Beltre to be at least consistent with recent years if not pick up the game a bit because of the contract year, for Encarnacion to show he finally belongs, and for Konerko to show he can still hit. I am one for three. My guys are DKFP out something like 65/16/75. Not enough. Not nearly enough.



Konerko I feel should be able to continue in his good ways. However, no one has his back as indicated by his low Run total. He generally hits fourth or fifth protecting Dye and Thome, but with the likes of Anderson and Pierzynski hitting behind him, I do not see that improving. Whither thou goest, Carlos Quentin!



Beltre seemed to be finding his groove lately, but recently admitted he may need surgery for bone spurs in his shoulder, maybe as early as this year. He is playing through the pain, but continued improvement in his BA or generating enough power to warrant a CM position does not look good.



Encarnacion has suffered set-backs from his wrist injury, but appears ready now to start a minor league rehab. Unfortunately, wrist injuries tend to linger, especially with guys who have pop in their bats, so again it looks like I am swimming upstream.



I drafted some depth, but as with most replacements, they can do fine over a few weeks, but rely on them for extended periods of time, flaws emerge. Duncan has 1B eligibility and started out the first few weeks fine, but is looking increasing average. In the last four games through Thursday, Duncan’s platoon mates Ankiel and Ludwick started in four and three games respectively, so they, despite Ludwick’s problems, are really the only “starters” in the group, especially when you throw the occasional Schumaker OF start. Rasmus, like Duncan, started only two. It will take an (a) injury and (b) what would be a surprising show of talent for Duncan to be able to help my team over the second half.



That leaves my Georgia Boy, Beckham. He has as much talent as any, but is so young (RedRyder, how did he slip past you?). He is one of the promising young stars and may hold my only hope of improving my team at the CM slots. Will he have the immediate impact that Wright did in 2004 or Braun did in 2007? Odds are no, but I do not see any better contenders out there. I continue to look over the various AL and NL benches as well as the high minors, but I need a true impact player, not some diamond in the rough.



No conclusions as it is still a long way to September. Still time to get hot as I try to move from "Pathetic" to "Mediocre" on my way to "Not Bad" and finally "Contention". And it keeps me focused on where my teams true needs are. As to pitching, well that is the deepest hole. Do you think I could talk Greg Maddux back into baseball? Well, I should get Kazmir back soon. Maybe he can rip off a few quality starts.



Thanks Shawn for letting me call out some of your numbers.



[ June 27, 2009, 06:12 AM: Message edited by: Edwards Kings ]
Baseball is a slow, boring, complex, cerebral game that doesn't lend itself to histrionics. You 'take in' a baseball game, something odd to say about a football or basketball game, with the clock running and the bodies flying.
Charles Krauthammer

DOUGHBOYS
Posts: 13091
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 6:00 pm

Just Thoughts!

Post by DOUGHBOYS » Sat Jun 27, 2009 4:32 am

Great stuff as always, Wayne.



Don't miss the movie coming out about Shawn's mom, Julia!

Shawn is a wonder, I've liked his team's, except for last year's and, of course, he had another great year.





Projections...Schmojections! :D



Really to me, saying "I think Longoria will hit 40 home runs" sounds alot less smarter than saying, "According to my projections, Longoria will hit 40 home runs".

So we now have projections, not thoughts. Or as I like to say, "My computer can beat up your computer!".



Beckham has hair like a young Donald Trump and killed in spring training and Jules wasn't all over him? She is slipping in her pedophile fantasy ways. :D



I saw Beckham in an interview yesterday. He showed the typical youthful exuberance that kids his age show. The expression on his face and tone of voice while describing the difference between minor league pitching and major league pitching made me think (project? :D ) that Beckham still has a little way to go before he really gets it.
On my tombstone-
Wait! I never had the perfect draft!

User avatar
Edwards Kings
Posts: 5909
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Duluth, Georgia

Just Thoughts!

Post by Edwards Kings » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:52 am

HOLY CRAP...for the first time in THREE WEEKS I got a save...no...two saves! The world is coming to an end...



Attended the baseball game, BoSox v Braves, Penny v Hanson. Hot as hell in Georgia. Sometime today or tomorrow I will post some observations, but I will say this is the first time I have seen Penny pitch in person. That is one BIG dude. From now on, I will refer to him as "Mr. Penny". He could be a linebacker....
Baseball is a slow, boring, complex, cerebral game that doesn't lend itself to histrionics. You 'take in' a baseball game, something odd to say about a football or basketball game, with the clock running and the bodies flying.
Charles Krauthammer

User avatar
Edwards Kings
Posts: 5909
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Duluth, Georgia

Just Thoughts!

Post by Edwards Kings » Sun Jun 28, 2009 1:11 pm

I wrote a little about what I thought Hanson was like today in the "Tommy Hanson" blog.



The Braves cannot hit. Chipper guessed right on a Penny change-up for a solo HR and I was in the bathroom when Anderson hit his, but I can tell you otherwise there just was not much the Braves could do with Penny.



Did I mention he was big? Looks like he was wearing shoulder pads. I posted during winter that I thought Penny was a good cheap pick-up for the BoSox as he has a live arm. Some disagreed, but I saw it today. He was cracking mid-90's all afternoon. Good control, only two K's though.



Jeff Francoeur was faked out of his jock on one play. Moving from second to third on a deep ball to short, Youk deeked him into thinking a throw was coming. Francoeur bought it, stopped, turned back towards second, and ran into Pedroia who still had the ball. I mean it was a bush league fake-out and Francoeur fell for it. Hanson got a hit as the next batter, which would have given the Braves an insurance run. Weak. Very weak.



Kelly Johnson got eat up in the field. Looked lost on a couple of plays. Boston is glad inter-league is over. Big Papi had two errors and Boston is very lucky they did not come home to roost.



There must be a law at the Ted that says the guy who sits in Aisle 208, Row 8, Seat 103 (I sit in 102) must weigh 300+ pounds. The last two times I have made it to the ballgame, some really large gentleman is sitting next to me. I come in at 250, so let's just say there is not much elbow room.



The beer was still $7 a pop.
Baseball is a slow, boring, complex, cerebral game that doesn't lend itself to histrionics. You 'take in' a baseball game, something odd to say about a football or basketball game, with the clock running and the bodies flying.
Charles Krauthammer

User avatar
Edwards Kings
Posts: 5909
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Duluth, Georgia

Just Thoughts!

Post by Edwards Kings » Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:08 am

Week 12 Results – Another hard luck kind of week. Philadelphia decided the one way for Rollins to work through his issues was to not see live-game pitching. My big questions going into the week for hitting (who to start between Rasmus, Duncan, Hafner, and Anderson) ended up being the most obvious answer of all…none of them. Each produced exactly the same counting stats (one run) with BA’s of 0.118, 0.231, 0.222, and 0.083 respectively. Phillips, Pence, Baker and Beckham were also cool. Konerko and Hawpe were hot and Headley proved once again he can hit on the road. BJ Upton continues his resurgence. Adrian Beltre did very well considering he is going under the knife Tuesday (wimp) by hitting 0.292. Last week I hit every stat. This week I hit none.



On pitching, I was trying to decide whether or not Arroyo or Owings would be the lesser risk. Neither were, though Owings had an OK game for his second start. Lidge came back and blew up immediately, but he and Gonzalez at least got me saves on Sunday. The Rays sent Sonnanstine down after his last blow up, but what I saw was seven K’s and only one walk. Looked like he was working through it, but the Rays thought Price and Jeff Niemann were better options…Jeff Niemann? C’mon! Danks, Davis and Vazquez were awesome and gave me some wins, K and ERA. Whip was off, but still not crushing.



Week 13 Planning – Mark DeRosa switched to the one team that would hurt me the most. DeRosa slid into the 4 hole in his first game with StL, but played LF. As if the Cards don’t have enough OFers. I think DeRosa will play every day, splitting time between third and OF. Greene will split between third if he keeps his head and SS. What happens when Glaus comes back? Since the Cards are currently committed to Ludwick and Ankiel, the losers will be Rasmus and Duncan. Neither can be looked upon as more than part timers with 10-12 AB a week.



With Encarnacion currently undergoing the longest rehab in history, and now Beltre setting him self up for an August (September?) return, I have lost both my starting third basemen. I am forced to use Beckham as my 3B and Duncan the part timer as my CM. I am going to hold onto Beltre until I hear how the surgery went. After that, who knows as I need help on the corners.



OF is tough this week too. I picked up Chris Dickerson, who got full time starts at the expense of Nix and Tavares last week, and will start him. CIN is at home this week which is a good thing. Already losing AB because of Duncan’s status, I will probably sit Rasmus for the same reason. That means be Headley will stay in though the Padres are at home all week. This is not a good thing. I may still decide to stick the PT player in, but probably not. Hawpe, Upton and Pence round it out.



Baker has cooled off, but Hernandez hit well last week. Phillips, Rollins (supposed to play Tuesday) and Felipe Lopez round out the team.



I am going with three relievers this week and hope Lidge can continue to turn it around and hope the Braves end up with a few more save opportunities. Kazmir is back, but of course his next start is in Arlington. I will start him but hope he can “Gaudin” them. I picked up Gaudin for a reasonable $38 (runner up bid was $21). I have been following him since I had him a couple of years ago with Oakland. Another big arm that has to control the walks to be effective (does he still have the funky beard?). Didn’t think Chicago ever gave him a real chance. I like now his home ball park but understand why some very knowledgeable people were hesitant to pick him up last week as his second start was in Texas. The epitome of the hot and cold pitcher, just prior to his last three good to great starts, he had two stinkers out of three. Hope he stays hot. I need a sixth to go with Kazmir, Vazquez, Gaudin, Danks and Wandy (Wandy has been alternating good starts with stinkers…needs to avoid the bad inning). The options are Arroyo with his two starts at home (who strangely enough has give up fewer HR at home) but may be bothered again by the CT Syndrome, Brett Anderson who had his start pushed back because of a sore forearm and now has two starts this week, and Doug Davis, who pitches in Cincinnati. I am not through looking at this one and I would love the extra start, but am leaning to Davis after his last excellent outing.



[ June 29, 2009, 08:09 AM: Message edited by: Edwards Kings ]
Baseball is a slow, boring, complex, cerebral game that doesn't lend itself to histrionics. You 'take in' a baseball game, something odd to say about a football or basketball game, with the clock running and the bodies flying.
Charles Krauthammer

User avatar
Edwards Kings
Posts: 5909
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Duluth, Georgia

Just Thoughts!

Post by Edwards Kings » Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:36 am

Originally posted by Edwards Kings:

Week 13 Planning – OF is tough this week too. Already losing AB because of Duncan’s status, I will probably sit Rasmus for the same reason. That means be Headley will stay in though the Padres are at home all week.Ohmanohmanohmanohmanohman!!!!! Am I glad I changed my mind and stuck Rasmus in this week instead of Headley!



[ July 05, 2009, 12:37 PM: Message edited by: Edwards Kings ]
Baseball is a slow, boring, complex, cerebral game that doesn't lend itself to histrionics. You 'take in' a baseball game, something odd to say about a football or basketball game, with the clock running and the bodies flying.
Charles Krauthammer

User avatar
Edwards Kings
Posts: 5909
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Duluth, Georgia

Just Thoughts!

Post by Edwards Kings » Mon Jul 06, 2009 2:11 am

I started this thread with posts from a log I keep to answer the question "What the hell was I thinking?" which inevitably is asked by all of us about out teams at some time or the other. After the draft, I did not post my team online, but I did record what my (rosey) thoughts were at that time. So, before I post my mid-season tale-of-woe, I thought I would post my post-draft look at the team I drafted. This is honestly what I wrote to myself (Self thought I was crazy, too) without mid-season edit to protect the mentally infirmed.



The Draft – Las Vegas League #2 March 21, 2009 – As I landed in Las Vegas Thursday night, I had no idea who I was going to draft in the #8 spot. In the past, I have done some value drafts. The problem with my value mentality was I kept leaving my team short two categories; saves and steals, which I still think are overvalued. However, it is very difficult to be successful without taking advantage of all available points, so I promised myself to bite the bullet and make sure I had two closers (one stud) and speed. Other than that, I really had no firm drafting strategy.



I had KDS’d a preference of 1-4 (actually, I did 1-13, 15, 14) really hoping to get Jose Reyes. I wanted to lock down steals, which has been one of my achilles heal the last two years. Then, coming around the corner, I was going to try for Justin Morneau/Aramis Ramirez and maybe a Shane Victorino in the 4th. Sometime Friday, however, I got over my disappointment over not getting my preferred draft spot (it would not surprise me if something like 90% of the Main Event participants this year wanted one of the top four spots) I started crafting two draft plans. One was around whether or not a player from the “second tier” (Sizemore, Cabrera, or Braun) slipped to me. There were really two plans in that one given Sizemore’s speed (power/speed combo in the first three picks versus power/power/speed). None of them dropped, so I never had a chance to see if it would work.



The other plan started out being a Howard versus Teixeira competition. Howard’s impact would be obvious on the HR/RBI front but he comes with the high 60’s or low 70’s contact rate, so BA would be certainly at risk. In the low 70’s, he can still produce a mid-270’s BA rate. He has hit better than .280, but to me that is more luck than bankable. Tex brings less power, but risk as well as I just am not sure he is NY material. He could end up fodder for the grist mill press and does not carry the “clutch” hitter profile. Either way, it was going to be a power bat play. Instead, I ended up with an epiphany related to my eventual pick, Jimmy Rollins.



What turned my mind to Rollins is the reflection that he is about the same as Reyes, whom I wanted if I had gotten on of the first four picks, less about 20 SB. That is a lot, but it put me closer to a strategy that I thought might work for me. Then, I made up my mind to lock down some more speed with power upside as well as anchor my middle infield, which to me had very few second tier opportunities, but a ton of third-rates who at best could help you out in one or two categories and hopefully not kill you in the others. For this I knew I wanted Brandon Phillips. I had, according my probabilities which were based on the satellite league ADP’s, a 99% chance of getting him with the 8th pick of the second round, but less than a 1% chance in the third. I knew this would be taking him several picks to early and I knew I would leave some players on the table, but I viewed it as a strategic move. If it works, I can pat myself on the back. If not, you can line up to kick me in the butt for being so stupid.



With those two to lead off, I was going to go power/power as I knew I would be behind about half the teams in power by this time (Phillips can hit 30, but it cannot be counted on). Every year, only about 45 players (give or take a few) will hit 30+ HR. I knew I needed to get at least my share. By the third round, I was just going to take the best power hitter not named Dunn left. With Phillips on my team, I did not think I could absorb Dunn’s BA, no matter what the power. I also knew I was not going to take Nate McLouth in the third or the fourth. A lot of people are justifiably high on him, but as a wise man once said, some people are Missouri/Missouri types (show me twice). I am one. I was also kicking around taking a catcher in the fourth, like a Martinez or Soto. I opted out as I view early catcher selections as gambles because of the position they play, and with a Rollins/Phillips combo, I had all the risk I could take for so early in the draft.



In the fifth, I was going to take a closer. I thought I would have a small (16%) chance at Papelbon , a good chance (77%) at Nathan, and the best chance at Lidge (89%). I would be happy with either one. The sixth was going to be my first starter and I wanted Shields and had a good chance to get him (67%). Seven, eight, nine and ten were going to be based on available power, position (the probability that I would be without a corner by this time would have me searched for best available) and pitcher (at least one more starter) availability. If I left the top ten rounds needing mainly starting pitching, outfielders and two catchers, I would feel pretty good.



So what happened? Like I mentioned earlier, the consensus top seven were gone so I picked Rollins. The second round was painful as Phillips WAS there, but also Carl Crawford, Carlos Lee, Matt Holliday, BJ Upton, and Lance Berkman. It was a tough call as all of those were much better “value” plays. I stuck to my (hopefully not empty) guns and took the Cincy 2nd baseman. I looked now at getting some power, but by some strange miracle, BJ Upton made it back to me in the third. This I took as a sign and while it meant I would probably be chasing power the rest of the draft, I could not pass it up. After his one week of extra spring training, hopefully Upton will be a studly anchor to my outfield and with Rollins/Phillips, I pretty much had my SB’s wrapped up as well as a good solid base for runs scored. Now I definitely throw out any thought of taking a catcher in the fourth. I am looking for a solid power source. The choices in my mind were Ortiz (whom I promptly pass on due to age/injury/position concerns), McLouth, and Pence. McLouth is the obvious pick here based on the ADP’s, but I took Pence, probably as much as a round early. I have generally been high on Pence, even with his funky swing. In my draft notes, I had him projected to hit 6th in the Astro line-up, but they have been having him hit 2nd recently, which is so much the better. In the fifth, I took Lidge according to plan as Papelbon (10th pick, 4th round) and Nathan (5th pick, 5th round) were already gone.



The second five went pretty much as planned, but I had to reach a round or two for players I thought “fit” my team, but may not have been “value” plays. In the sixth, I wanted my first SP and pitchers were flying off the board, as expected. I had my rankings for pitchers I might be able to get as Shields, Beckett, Lackey, Kazmir, and King Felix. The last two probably went seventh round in most leagues, but again in this draft I am not afraid to stretch. Lackey (thank the baseball gods taken 4th pick of the 6th round), Shields (stolen from me by RedRyder with the 5th pick of the 6th round), and Beckett (6th pick of the 6th round) left me with the choice of Kazmir or Felix. I went Kazmir because of his supporting team.



By the time my next pick came around, 21 corner men were taken with seven owners having two already and seven having one, so I was the only one with no cornerman. To me, the best remaining were Figgins, Beltre and Gordon. I didn’t so much need what Figgins was offering, and didn’t feel I could afford Gordon’s BA, so I took generally reliable Beltre, who is also in a contract year. In the eighth, a pitcher who started out in the Fall mocks as a 10th or 11th round pick had gotten hot and moved up a round or two in the latest ADP’s. I am real high on Javier Vazquez and his 200 IP, 200 K potential, so I made him my second SP pick. He could end up the real anchor on my team. In the ninth, I was not really looking OF here as I already had BJ Upton and Hunter Pence, but Brad Hawpe was here and this is about where he should be drafted. I have him penciled in for 25 HR, but if the stars line up right, 30 is not out of the question and he should be as good a #3 OF as just about anybody has.



I reached again in the 10th for a player who forever has had upside, Edwin Encarnacion. I had him batting 5th in the Reds line-up, but he appears to be batting 6th most of the time, which is not so good for me. The reach was at least a round or two, so I am hoping this gamble pays off. After ten, I have two MI, two CM, three OF, one Closer, and two Starters. Going in the second ten rounds, a second closer is at the top of my wish list (so I can leave the first draft in three years with two), with starting pitching the next priority, some mid-round decent power-types, and at least one catcher. If any MI or CM drop a round or two, I will snag one of those as well, so my sticking to plan has given me some breathing room (i.e. I am not stretching for MI or steals) to sit back and wait for some value picks if they show up. None really did as the league I am in has too many good players to let too much of that happen and most of my luck I think was used up on the BJ Upton slide.



There were a lot of closer choices still left on the table up through the 149th pick of the draft. Then six closers went in the next eight picks and all I could do was mark them off. I wanted a Heath Bell or a Chad Qualls type, but both of those were snatched up during the run. The best available closer left to me I thought was Mike Gonzalez. Injury prone for sure, but he has been saying (stop me if you have heard this one before) that he feels better than he has in years, so as a second closer he may not be too bad. He is bringing heat again, so it may work out. Sounds like I am trying to convince myself, doesn’t it? Still, the closers left after my pick were Hanrahan, Devine, Motte, Lindstrom, Lyon, Sherrill, Percival and Hoffman (old, declining K-rate). I think Gonzalez is better than those. But now I have my two closers. Check that off my list and I have one less thing to worry about in the draft.



I was waffling about whether or not to pick the best bat or the best arm, but starting with Derek Lowe, (11th round, 10th pick), Matt Garza (11th round, 13th pick), KJ Duke’s pick of Josh Johnson (12th round, 2nd pick), and RedRyder getting Harang (12th round, 5th pick), I decided to join the run and pick either Danks or Verlander. I went with Danks (Verlander was picked next) even though I think he is at risk because of the extra innings he pitched last year. By this time, however, just about every pick carries some risk and if anyone can handle the innings, I have a feeling Danks can. Now I really need a bat and I am looking for guys who are not too old and are maybe coming off sub-par year(s). I get my firstbaseman by nabbing Paul Konerko. This is about where he had been going in the satellites and at 32 I feel he has some left in the tank, especially given his home field.



At 14, I grabbed my third Red and first catcher in Ramon Hernandez. I do not expect great things out of him (some think his new home park will help him, but it is not like Baltimore is a pitchers haven), but with a very little bit of luck, he could hit for decent average again and pop 15 to 20 HR. He may not be one of the Super M’s, but he could very easily be a top ten catcher and not a bad catcher anchor.



At fifteen, I went for one of my “sleepers” in Wandy Rodriguez. I think he fits perfectly on my team and last year he much improved his road splits. At 30, I do not think break-out is the right word, but he will be one of the better fourth starters. Pretty much from here on out, I am targeting specific players whom I think are either solid, rebound candidates, or unheralded. At 16 I picked up Felipe Lopez as my final MI. He will not crack 30 SB again (much less 40), but he is hitting leadoff in a powerful offensive line-up. A 15-15 mark with a very good BA will make him a very valuable pick. And he could more.



At 17 I went Andy Sonnanstine. Great team, should end the year with good ERA/WHIP. Won’t help me much in K’s, but the first four SP’s should cover that nicely and he can win 15 games. Good #5 for me, especially from here on out in LV#2 where I felt like good SP were scarcer than hens teeth. At 18, I picked Hafner. He may not hit 40, but at 31/32 he is not done. Thirty HR is within his reach. He is an 18th round pick who will spend most of his time batting 4th in a good line-up. If Pronk can give me closer to a .300 (which he has done frequently in the past) BA rather than .250 (which he has done frequently in the past) BA, he will not lose AB to Garko. At 19 I went with one of last years “hot” players, Chase Headley. He hates hitting in Petco, so I want to use him on his road games as much as possible and maybe he will be traded. Probably better as my 5th OF than my 4th, but he has much upside. John Baker, who is batting 2nd ahead of Hanley, is my second catcher whom I got in the 20th round. My friend Dave Clum said the scouts think this kid is a legit hitter, so I am hoping he will help not hinder my BA. If he can hold up in the 2 hole, he also will give me a good source of runs, rare in catchers.



After this, I am filling in holes. Bronson Arroyo (21st) will be lead guitar and hopefully a decent #6, though I would like it if he was my part time #7 SP. I picked Ryan Church in the 22nd. He was showing his pedigree pre-concussion and if he gets 500+ AB, I will consider him the pick of my draft. I picked Chris Duncan 23rd and Colby Rasmus 25th, so one of them could be my fifth OFer or UT if Headley, Church, or Hafner have problems. Rafael Soriano (24th) is a good handcuff to Gonzalez. Overbay (26th), Griffey (27th), Crede (28th), Lugo (29th) and CJ Wilson (30th) round out the spares and two of them are already gone in my mind from my team (Crede and Wilson) in my search for more starting pitching, which is my greatest weakness. My second biggest concern is BA. Most of my guys COULD have good BA and all HAVE had good BA, but many ARE just a capable of hitting .250. Barring injury, speed and runs scored should not be an issue and I may take one of the top two spots in both. I will not lead my league in HR or RBI, but I have a good chance at getting 12 points in each.



For pitching, Saves should be alright (say 12 or 13 points). ERA and K’s are about 12 points each. The back end of my rotation is weak, so I need some help there or my WHIP could be middle of the pack. Wins are unpredictable, but with Tampa, Chicago (AL), and Atlanta holding my core guys with Houston providing adequate support for Wandy, I hope to reach my goals there, too.
Baseball is a slow, boring, complex, cerebral game that doesn't lend itself to histrionics. You 'take in' a baseball game, something odd to say about a football or basketball game, with the clock running and the bodies flying.
Charles Krauthammer

Post Reply